• Mahonia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    9 months ago

    I once tried to do a relatively basic repair on a phone, and ended up really breaking it. Like the touch screen won’t work because I broke some shit on the motherboard that now requires micro soldering broke it.

    So I send it to a repair company that allegedly does some micro soldering, and they call me to tell me they can’t repair it because their diagnostic utility doesn’t work unless it’s the stock OS (I’ve been a GrapheneOS user for many years). What they do is… wipe my data and then tell me it’s not the screen so they can’t repair it.

    Then I sent it to an actually good repair shop and they fixed it very quickly, easily understanding the problem. Good repair companies aren’t easy to find but damn are they worth it. They’re almost always smaller shops and they do not GAF what you do with your phone’s software.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s illegal under the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act.

    Send them a certified letter. Inform them that they need to prove you caused the damage, repair or replace your device, or you’ll be taking them to arbitration.

    They generally have to pay for the arbiter, so it’ll be cheaper to just replace your cheap phone even if they win.

      • Armand1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        You can’t void your warranty by rooting your phone. They claim you can, but that’s only their extended warranty, not that statutory one.

        • sphfaar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Even in cars it’s the same thing, if you tune it they don’t know where to look since it’s no longer the same, On rooted android you can install things like Advanced Charging Controller to fuck your battery, and many software that manage performance/temperature.

          • Dempf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Maybe so, but under the Act, the burden is on the company to prove that the modification directly caused the failure in question.

            They can’t just deny deny for no reason. But that’s the tactic as consumers are largely unaware of their rights under the law, and they typically get away with it until the FTC sends a bunch of nasty letters telling them that they’re breaking the law. See “warranty void if removed” stickers.

            There’s some good discussion of this very issue in this article from a few years back. They touch on the sort of “overclocking” situation that you’re talking about.

            https://www.vice.com/en/article/yp3nax/jailbreaking-iphone-rooting-android-does-not-void-warranty

            In my personal opinion, even a modification that can be used to push the hardware to operate beyond it’s design limits doesn’t inherently void any part of a warranty if it’s not used for that purpose. Let’s think through a few examples.

            Does obtaining root on a Windows PC void the hardware warranty since it’s now possible for you to install a kernel driver that lets you overclock?

            Does the presence of MSI Afterburner installed on a machine void hardware warranties? Regardless of whether you use it for overclocking or just for graphing and monitoring?

            Does installing Linux on a PC that you own void the hardware warranty?

            In my mind, the car example is a bit different. I don’t quite know what you mean by “tune”, but I’m going to assume it’s something like ECU remapping. To me, remapping an ECU seems similar to the act of overclocking, since you’re modifying the physical inputs to the engine itself. And I can see how out-of-spec physical inputs could cause irreversible damage to an engine. But that doesn’t mean that every conceivable ECU modification would be grounds to deny a claim for engine failure.

            (Disclaimer: I have no experience with ECU remapping so I’m making some assumptions)

            As another example, let’s say your car comes with an ECU that has some security mechanisms to prevent reflashing. Could the manufacturer deny a warranty claim on engine failure just because you circumvented the security mechanism? Even if you never remapped the ECU parameters?

            What if your ECU fails, and you decide to install a 3rd party ECU. The new ECU has no security mechanism preventing you from reflashing, but the map that it comes with, while provided by the 3rd party, is functionally equivalent to that in the stock ECU. Can the manufacturer deny a warranty claim on an engine failure, just because without the security mechanism you could have reflashed a new map designed for more performance than stock? Even if you didn’t? Could they deny the warranty due to the 3rd party map? Even if physical inputs to the engine stay within safe parameters?

            I think you do raise a good point about the logical connection that Samsung could make between the modification (root) and the failure (battery). But the point I’m making is: the legal burden is on them to make that connection, and show how one caused the other.

            On the other hand, some of the questions and examples that I raised are admittedly messy, and might not have a clear answer unless tested by a court.

            I guess what I’m saying though is: if the cost to seek legal relief here is relatively low (e.g., arbitration or small claims), then if I were OP I would probably go down that route, personally, and make arguments based on Magnuson Moss.

            IANAL

            • sphfaar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yes, by tuning I meant ECU remapping or installing aftermarket parts.

              btw like anything to contest, legal action is only worthwhile if the profit at least covers the lawyer’s fees and the time lost, unfortunately.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            But under the Act, they have to show that what you did caused the malfunction. The burden of proof is on them.

            It’s why “warranty void if removed” stickers on products are unenforceable in court.

  • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s illegal for them to do that, BTW. They have to prove magisk damaged your battery.

    I ran into this with Dell when they tried to claim after market RAM was the reason a CPU core wasn’t responding to interrupt requests.

    All it took was asking for the diagnostic data showing that the aftermarket RAM caused it to get the warranty repair approved.

    You just gotta push back until they cave. Maybe ask for their mailing address for your FTC report or for the number to their legal department (most call centers are terrified of escalating anything to the actual company).

    But, don’t directly threaten legal action, because they’ll stop the call right there.

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s illegal for them to do that, BTW. They have to prove magisk damaged your battery.

      And you have to be able to afford those rights. If you can’t afford to sue them then you’re screwed.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s where the arbitration clauses they make you agree to are actually helpful.

        THEY have to pay for arbitration. You don’t need an attorney, and generally they’ll just take care of you because it’s cheaper than hiring an arbiter.

        • funkycarrot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Isn’t forced arbitration when the jury deciding on the case is on the payroll of the company you’re having the problem with in the first place?

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Not exactly.

            It’s when there’s a third-party arbiter. In the case of customers seeking damages against these companies, the arbitration agencies are paid for by the company, but often there’s a list of arbiters the complainant can choose between.

            My personal strategy has always been to pick the most expensive one so that whether I win or lose, the company stags to lose more money on the process than by simply making me whole.

            The real reason for forced arbitration is because it makes DIY class action suits impossible.

            Otherwise, a company with a class action waiver would find themselves facing 10,000 cases from the same law firm instead of 1 case with 10,000 plaintiffs.

            With forced arbitration they can skip out on the cost process entirely and make the defendant do more leg work.

            And, importantly, there’s no precedent with arbitration. Losing the first case doesn’t necessarily snowball into you losing the next 9,999 cases with identical facts.

      • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        If you read further, I give suggestions on how to do that without a lawyer.

        It’s going to cost the company more money to call their lawyers than just doing the repair, so it usually doesn’t even take a ton of push back.

  • kadu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    9 months ago

    Here in Brazil the hardware and software are technically two different products, in such a way that you can’t deny a hardware warranty repair due to software modifications. That’s the good part.

    The bad part is that manufacturers do that anyway because they know you won’t pay the legal fees to challenge this in court. This strategy mostly pays off. If you’re particularly annoying, or somebody from our customer protection watchdog happens to take interest in your claim, the company will fold and repair the modified device for you eventually.

      • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        9 months ago

        This kind of thing is illegal in mist eu countries but they also dont enforce it like in brasil. Iirc norway enforces it because a bunch of people sued samsung together.

  • PhreakyByNature@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Samsung have been trying to dodge honouring under warranty for years - check the comments for how much work had to be put in to get them to honour it. It pays to fight sometimes.

  • Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    I fried the battery charging chip for my HTC dream when I rooted and used it as a router for the family in holiday. I felt it was hot to the touch but I thought “it’s gonna be ok, surely it has temperature sensors and it will throttle”. High draw for a long time when charging = the chip exploded and it wouldn’t charge anymore. Luckily the battery was removable and I already got an external charger for it from dealextreme. But HTC still repaired it for free under warranty even if it was my fault and I gave to them back rooted.

    Same for LG when my rooted Nexus 5X boot looped, although that was an endemic problem caused by LG shitty manufacturing (they changed the stance a few months after that, never bought LG anymore)

    Samsung should repair it, I thought they were the only ones root friendly left on the market…

    • dandu3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Samsung isn’t root friendly at all. Most of their phones can’t be bootloader unlocked officially.

      The only ones that do are google, moto and the chinese ones

  • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    While this is some bullshit companies pull, you don’t have third party repair companies in your area?

    • Vuraniute@thelemmy.clubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      samsung does bullshit where the parts have serial codes paired to the phone or whatever and you need to match it using their proprietary software for it to function. apple does it too.

      • OpenStars@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 months ago

        I bought a Samsung as well. We should both learn from our mistakes, and never do that again - this is simply the cost of doing business with them. Maybe Fairphone would be good?

        • Vuraniute@thelemmy.clubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          where can I get a good phone like a pixel or fairphone or whatever in greece? phones like that cant be found anywhere.

          • OpenStars@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            Sadly I know very little there. I know I HATE my current Samsung (mostly due to the company practices like you mentioned), and I also felt incredibly betrayed by my OnePlus 7T before that (the device itself was amazing, until an update broke it and now it literally hurts my hand, like I wonder if it’s giving me cancer by radiating something through the shielding that it burned through), and before that I absolutely adored my Nexus 5 (but Pixels are a whole other thing entirely - far too much camera and too little actual phone for my tastes). The entire smartphone world is incredibly predatory. I mostly figure that the next one I get will be a cheap phone, maybe even a dumb flip… but on the other hand I do live in an area where Google (or whatever) Maps could really help out so… I don’t know what I’ll do when my current one craps out:-(. Probably I will research a Fairphone, but if you live in an area where that would be difficult to repair, then yeah that may not be an option for you:-(. At least you live within the EU though where such is being forced to change, so you have that going for you.:-)

          • dzervas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            γερμανος κ ξερο ψωμι!

            BTW: please don’t root/install magisk on a phone you use <3

        • toastal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Fairphone removed the headphone jack so it’s pretty useless as a personal electronic device IMO

      • JohnWorks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Do you have a source for this? I’ve tried looking up anything online to see if this is something Samsung started to do but couldn’t find anything. I am also seeing 3rd party batteries available on Amazon for the a32 5g.

        Here’s an example that seems to have good reviews. Couldn’t find anything in the reviews that say the battery needed to be paired.

        Edit: battery said it wasn’t for a32 5g here’s another https://a.co/d/7Zy2N88

          • JohnWorks@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Looking though that it looks like Samsung made a comment

            Samsung’s representative stated:

            “I’m unfamiliar with the specific variables that could have come into play with this repair or the unsubstantiated comments from Mr. Jeffrey. What I can tell you is that there is no requirement to pair parts on our smartphones. If a repair were conducted correctly, a device would not lose functionality.”

            I was checking to see if anyone made any additional comments on the Hugh Jeffreys video and someone said they replaced the screen but kept the fingerprint sensor and it still worked fine. I believe replacing the battery with a 3rd party option should still have the device working fine.

            Hugh left a comment on the video as well:

  • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    you can absolutely do it yourself. be prepared and get the right tools, look up many many guides and videos before you start, but I honestly think it’s doable for someone whose never opened a phone. those batteries are an absolute pain in the ass to remove, but as long as it’s discharged below 20% you really don’t have to worry about it it catching fire or anything catastrophic like you’re lead to believe (just be careful ofc and wear PPE)

      • Tak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I replaced the battery in my old Pixel 3a by myself without the tools with iFixit. They shipped me the battery and tools I’d need for like $50 and all I had to do was follow the guide.

      • Chiwiu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        where I live there are shops for laptop, console and phone repairs. I’d keep it simple and go to one of those

        • Been a while since I looked, but last time I checked around me, the starting price for any work like that was like $200 (maybe it was less?). Not exactly worth it for a $300 phone that’s already aging unless you need data off it or something. Granted, YMMV with pricing.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    If magisk still works like custom stuff in the days of old, settings could very much change battery draw and charge rates that could cause premature wear of a battery.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      So does installing a app that plays videos. Since watching videos drains more battery than say a typical phone call.

      This argument is weak at best.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Any video apk you install can’t consume more than what the kernel allows for. It can’t change throttling parameters, cant change apu speed, and it can’t change how fast the battery can be charged or the upper limit it will charge to. All apks can only do what they’re allowed to do, and it’s a lot less than what flashed phones and custom kernels can do. Right now, for instance, your phones battery never actually charges to max capacity, or discharges to minimum capacity before powering down. Your “100%” is actually more like 90%, but it increases the batts lifespan because the most damage done to lithium batteries is at the high end and low end of what it can hold. Same for all the fast charge stuff. Fast charging is bad for the batt. That’s why even if you’re using the fastest charge option on your phone, by the time you hit around 50% it starts slowing the charge rate down. The phone is programmed to do that to save the battery from degrading quicker. A custom kernel and OS could change that.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m sure, but how are they actually supposed to know that? You unlocked your bootloader, installed something like twrp, and obtained root access to jiggle with anything you want at that point. I used to have a lot of fun doing all that type of stuff, but I knew I voided out my warranty doing it unless I could still roll it back to factory and remove root, first. Not to mention dealing with knox.

        • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Except legally the burden is on Samsung to prove you damaged the battery. They don’t get to say “oh well you could have done xyz, denied”

          • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            No, it’s not. That’s an impossible standard for the company to hold.

            You buy the product under the assessment that you will void the warranty by doing XYZ, if you want that level of access you have made changes that could have damaged the battery and they don’t have the time to grill every wannabe tech douche to make sure they didn’t fuck up the device themselves.

            They tell you what you can and can’t do with the product AND still receive support up front, case closed.

    • covert_czar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah I bootlooped my samsung phone and the service center didn’t gave a shit about it They said the circuit itself is damaged and is hardbricked I fixed it with some kind of unlock tool lol
      I forgot the tool’s name Anyways i broke the screen just after few months fixing all this RIP💀

  • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    My battery broke earlier because I installed GrapheneOS and abused speed charging thr entire time at night.

    A stock android would slow the battery charge till the first Alarm.

  • massacre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    If it’s under warranty, they almost certainly cannot deny the claim for this or really many bullshit reasons manufacturers say like removing a “warranty void” sticker - which is still covered. You can sue in small claims. Check out the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act should you need to prove your point.