The U.S. government should block the import of low-cost Chinese autos and parts from Mexico, a U.S. manufacturing advocacy group said on Friday, warning they could threaten the viability of American car companies.

  • NataliePortland@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    American EV manufacturers are consistently cutting their production citing waning demand. This is obviously false since the US is blocking cheap imports, car makers have everything to gain by limiting supply and keeping prices high.

  • Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Blocking imports of Chinese EVs while American manufacturers keep their EVs as luxury products and prioritize CE vehicles is not only blatant protectionism, but another way to kill the planet for the sole purpose of enriching a small minority of very wealthy people.

  • Tak@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I thought corporate industry liked the free market and no regulation.

  • Mx Phibb@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Chuckles, “Yep, only American manufacturers should be allowed to cheaply build cars in Mexico and export them to the US.”

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      The issue is they’re wanting to sell $30,000 cars for $15,000 (with the rest paid for by the Chinese government) which sounds great as a consumer until all the other manufacturers exit the market due to the impossibility of competing with those subsidies. Once they eliminate the competition, they’ll start selling these $30,000 cars for $50,000+ because “fuck you who else are you going to buy from?” That’s not to say the current crop of manufacturers aren’t fucking us over too but this isn’t how you eliminate that problem. You’re just trading one bully who steals your lunch money for another.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          “What about…” “what about…” “what about…”

          If you have an actual rebuttal or argument to make, spit it out already. Leave it to hexbear users to derail any discussion by flinging feces and posting CCP images.

          • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            One country subsidizing an industry while imposing tarrifs on another country for subsizing that same industry is literally an actionble dispute in the WTO so it is very much an actual rebuttal.

            Try defending a WTO subsidies dispute with “Whataboutism!” And see how that goes.

      • rogrodre [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        do you have any sources for that? because byd is selling their cars elsewhere in the world for 30k-50k usd new, similar to competing american brands. The only thing I can find is a tax incentive that’s less than the tax credit you can get in the us.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Interesting that you chose to use ‘capitalism’ as a pejorative while simultaneously trying to defend negative aspects of it.

          • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I’m pointing out that your problem with this is the problem you should have with the entire wildly destructive and corrupt US auto industry, which is doing the thing you’re afraid chinese car makers might one day do. I know it’s a hard thing for people poisoned by nationalism to apply a standard uniformly, but do try.

            • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              I think one of us has been poisoned by nationalism and it definitely isn’t me. You and your buddies entire chain of comments here is laughably hypocritical, but I understand you all have a job to do with regards to pushing CCP propaganda.

                • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Sure thing, buddy. You’re the only one bringing up communism and trying to act like this is some east versus west dick measuring contest. You can’t even make a coherent argument about why you think this is a good thing and instead go straight for whataboutism and ad hominem attacks.

      • filister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Oh come on. The US has super conservative and protectionist policies.

        The fact is that both CATL and BYD have the upper edge in battery technology. And that a lot of Chinese car manufacturers have very good and competitive products.

        European car brands are really struggling to transition to the future and still can’t figure out their software and technology. They are run by old guys who are still trying to save the ICEs as this technology is a gatekeeper of their businesses.

      • zkrzsz [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        because “fuck you who else are you going to buy from?”

        Well, you can buy from another China’s auto company or other country’s car company. Or maybe it will make your country allocate budget from something big and destructive to the world and reallocate them to the failing auto industry?

      • Mx Phibb@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        True, but banning them seems like using a nuke to deal with a fly, just a bit overkill. I don’t expect the Chinese to play fair, but it seems that just saying that the rules only apply to American companies seems wrong and lazy.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah I don’t think outright bans are much of a solution either. Tariffs would usually apply to a situation like this but it seems they can bypass those by building in and shipping from Mexico.

      • PosadistInevitablity [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You admitted yourself the harm is already happening; just with American companies.

        At the very worst, we are fucked either way.

        The alternative is, maybe the Chinese government doesn’t fuck us over. So at least we have a chance with them.

        Honestly, that leaves me wondering why you care other than the “scheming asiatic” angle to this

  • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well American civilization has been deliberately constructed to require cars for survival outside a number of cities you can count on one hand and cars from US manufacturers are getting so expensive that even used cars are becoming unaffordable to large and growing segments of the population, so I don’t know that I care that Ford’s bottom line will be impacted.