After so much seething over the EU and the DMA, how will he continue to defend his favorite megacorp?
Without having read the actual lawsuit yet
Says it all
Oh dear.
“The overriding gist of the DOJ’s lawsuit against Apple brought to mind, for DF reader E.G., Kurt Vonnegut’s dystopian short story Harrison Bergeron. Despite being an enormous Vonnegut fan, I couldn’t recall reading it before. It’s so apt. As E.G. quipped in his email to me, “Only in making all products, services, and experiences equally bad, will we have equality and fairness.””
This fuckin guy.
Edit: iPhone user, I have iPads and Macs and AirPods and all that shit. But I also think the government is probably onto something here.
Apple fanboys: “Apple has a singular, perfect vision for how people should interact with technology. I would get all my sensory organs replaced by Apple peripherals if I could. They should be allowed to trample us.”
NB: apple has trampled over me but not my spirit
I came here for his full-throated support of Apple Music staying installed no matter what and I am so sorely disappointed.
idk who this guy is, anyone feel like giving a primer?
The least interesting member of the gruber family, they wrote him out of die hard 4.
Longtime Apple trufan, co-creator of markdown, and often-middling internet thonker
Occasionally has some good opinions but only occasionally, very much got blinders on a lot of the time
co-creator of markdown
my opinion of Gruber immediately went from “fuck that guy” to “FUCK THAT GUY” when I realized he’s the same one who’s been writing the garbage non-specs that guarantee I’ll never have a good time parsing bbcode-but-everywhere
Yeah with that one the guy rolled a 1d3 and got to apply a constant psychic damage effect to the whole world
Like you know how you get weird internet nerds who’ll take a bullet for felon musk? Gruber will take 10 for apple
All you need to know about Gruber is in this claim of his about phone photography, in a critique of a NY Times tech journalist who deigned to acknowledge that readers could just use flash to get better low-light photos:
A mainstream technology columnist should be explaining to readers why they should not use flash, and how best to capture low-light photographs without it. “You could always just use flash” is technology malpractice.
In reality, a mainstream technology columnist’s job isn’t to encourage readers to cough up hundreds of dollars to buy the newest phone for the sake of something that might be of negligible importance to most of them.
Gruber clearly thinks his job is to always encourage readers to buy the latest Apple phone. At least when his job isn’t to sniff his own farts.
Flash is also technology! Most photography and videography is done using artificial light! There aren’t many people walking around with spy satellite lenses like fucking Kubrick to do natural light camera work.
Also I think he’s a bit of a fancy watch douchebag.
aka “weak opinions, strongly held”
Cory is having none of this shit
The foundational tenet of “the Cult of Mac” is that buying products from a $3t company makes you a member of an oppressed ethnic minority and therefore every criticism of that corporation is an ethnic slur
Is Apple obligated to ship an iMessage client for other platforms? For free?
norman_rockwell_freedom_of_speech.jpeg
Open secure messaging protocols with freely available and unencumbered specifications and even implementations are good, actually.
I wish XMPP or Matrix or whatthefuckever existed so that we didn’t have to rely on fifteen fucking proprietary IM systems to communicate with an adequate portion of our friends.
Can we make it an outright criminal offense to ship a new messaging application without an accompanying RFC detailing the format? With aggravating circumstances if you outright forbid third party clients that end up being created anyway.
it’s always great when these guys respond to well-established antitrust law by incorrecting the world on the concept of “competition” from first principles
