We’re adding the ability to customize this in the upcoming release, but I’m wondering what people think would be a good default.

The 4 pieces of showable/hideable info are: Upvotes, Downvotes, Score, and Upvote %.

In Jerboa, I had a temporary default (until the next lemmy release), of Score + Upvote %, but people seem to dislike this a lot.

I’ll check back on this in a few days to see the result.

  • gimpchrist @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not really sure what any of this means but if something has one upvote and one down vote it should show that?

  • testeronious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I think it should display only the score. But when I hover with my mouse it should show the upvote and downvote count.

    The same goes to the mobile version, but instead of hovering with a mouse I can hold my finger on the score and the app displays the upvote/downvote count.

    I like a more simple and clean approach, I believe this helps bring less tech-savvy users to lemmy.

  • kia@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think score, then in smaller less noticeable text, upvotes and downvotes. I don’t think upvote % adds much value as you have the information to calculate it already.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      My original motivation was trying to limit information overload, and go from 3 pieces of score info, down to 2. This will all be configurable, but I’d like the default to be really simple.

  • roguetrick@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t think you’ll ever get a concrete answer on this because different people treat even basic numbers differently none the less assigning value to them. I like upvoted/downvote view because I like being able to see what’s controversial. It means a comment is both important to show a dividing line but also might be misleading.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Up + Down. That way you can’t use trolling/harassment to sway the perception of a post.

    Put it this way: Do you want the nazis who downvote everything left of Hitler to have any sway over a conversation?

  • LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Difficult to say until we’ve seen it in action for a while. Could we trial each for a while and then ask us again?

  • Oka@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Upvotes and downvotes, but also add the YouTube lightsaber which shows the ratio?

  • normonator@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Up and down preferably, anything else is just worse.

    Otherwise overridable by user preference would be great.

  • Annoyed_🦀 🏅@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    1)Big score with up/downvote at the side, and also the ability to see the votes for everyone.

    Or

    2)Big score and the ability to see the votes for everyone

      • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        If the server’s going to enforce this then I feel like the default should be total up and down, as all the others can be calculated from those two numbers by the clients. Other methods I would foresee be used by instances that somewhat wants to hide or fuzz the numbers, so that’d be an opt-in thing that defaults to maximum transparency.

        • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Its a user-specific setting, not a server setting. And this is just a preference for the default, it’ll still be configurable.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      We’re still working on it, but we’ll add logic into the front ends to make sure these settings can’t conflict.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, I was confused about what it was (I thought it was some indication of how fresh the comment was for sorting purposes). A percent isn’t interesting when most comments have like 5 votes or whatever, and it’s still not that interesting even if there are more.

  • sgtlion [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Even though we don’t use it on this instance, I do find the up vote and down vote counts the most interesting and transparent

  • Jake [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I honestly love the way Alexandrite does the interface on Lemmy.world. I used photon for awhile too, but the way Alexandrite does voting made a positive overall experience that was more pleasant long term, (a.Lemmy.world & p.lemmy.world). Alexandrite simply ignores the down vote count and displays the total. Overall negativity is not clearly seen unless the count goes below zero.

    Long term this makes a more positive overall experience across the spectrum of emotions in real life, especially for someone struggling through disability. The only way I would change this is to add a negative vote view in the … extras.