• mavedustaine@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, the US has abysmal public transport (at least in houston, tx in my case) compared to even third world countries like Egypt. It’s downright embarrassing.

      • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I live inside the 275 loop around Cincinnati. My work is 11 miles away. In order to get to work via public transit I’d have to walk 3.5 miles to the closest bus stop, take a bus the wrong direction, wait for a transfer to another bus heading closer to work, and then walk 2.5 miles to my job. The schedule is so sparse it would take me 3-4 hrs one way and I’d be walking more than half of it. No bike lanes or sidewalks either, and the roads are so dangerous that in almost 20 years of working there I’ve never seen a bike attempt any of my possible routes. I have seen memorial bikes on the roadside where someone got hit.

    • newIdentity@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I live in Germany and while not perfect, I’m glad we have such a thing.

      The problem is when a 10 minute car drive takes an hour with public transportation

      • Rakn@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Next problem is surge pricing and general ticket prices. I recall one city I was living in a few years back having advertisements for taking the train. And I was like “Yeah sure. It’s just double the price and triple the time”.

        To me taking the train (at least for long distances) is a luxury thing.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. Saudi Aramco is wrecking the environment because (among others) Dow Chemical keeps buying their oil. Dow Chemical keeps buying their oil because Sterilite keeps buying the plastic that Dow makes. Sterilite keeps buying Dow’s plastic because people keep buying Sterilite bins to store all their junk. Ultimately if there wasn’t a person consuming things at the end of the chain, the oil wouldn’t be removed from the ground in the first place.

      Ultimately it all comes down to people’s lifestyles. When you buy something that’s made of plastic or transported on a container ship, you’re giving these companies money they use to wreck the environment. If instead of kiwi fruit, you buy melons from an Amish farmer who brought them to market using a horse-drawn carriage, that lifestyle choice has an impact on the environment.

      Having said that, it’s true that companies use lobbying to twist laws in their favour, and use sales and marketing to drive demand for their products. It’s hard to know whether a product you’re buying is damaging to the environment because the companies that damage the environment don’t want you to know and will oppose any law that makes it clearer. It’s hard to choose to purchase a less environmentally destructive item if you don’t know it exists.

      But, it’s just ridiculous bullshit to pretend that nefarious companies are out there burning coal just for fun, while cackling evilly. Everything companies do is in service to making money, and virtually the only way they make money is to sell things that people want to buy.

    • EnderWi99in@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s largely a problem of government that is exacerbated by the influence of the businesses themselves. It’s the governments job to enact policy change that force business to address these issues and develop more sustainable production process and product offerings, but since the government has essentially been bought out by those same businesses, nothing happens at all.

      We can’t decouple business from government without policy changes that would place limitations on such influence, and we cannot enact those policies because of the influence from businesses. I don’t see a solution unless people wise up and elect a lot of people in the same election cycle not beholden to these groups, but I don’t know how that can be accomplished.

  • raresbears@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Swap your car or plane ride for a bus or train

    Kinda hard to do when there’s nowhere near enough investment in public transit

    • Taxxor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah where I live, there’s a bus every 2 hours that needs ~30 minutes to get to where I work. If I took that, I’d have to walk an additional 15 minutes to my actual workplace and I’d still be an hour too early.
      And after work, I’d have to again walk 15 minutes to the bus stop and wait another 30 minutes for the bus home.

      So between leaving my house and coming back home, there’d be ~11.5 hours. When I use my car, that’s ~9.5 hours.

      • crdz@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My old job was located out of the city and the times I worked there were no busses running (4am til whenever we were done) so I drove ~30 minutes to work, then work between 12 to 14 hours then drive back, which can take between 30 minutes to an hour if there was an accident. Then only being able to sleep like 3 hours a night then repeat the process was torture.

        I’m so glad I was able to get a remote job where now I actually have time during my work days to do other things like actually go to gym everyday and be able to see my family more rather than just work and sleep.

  • MrFagtron9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is such a fucking stupid argument to make.

    The reason airlines make x% of CO2 emissions is because people want to fly, they’re an airline, and there is no emissions free way to power a plane.

    The reason the plastic company makes x billions of plastic sporks every year is because I want a spoon to eat my Taco Bell Nachos in my car. They’re not making all the plastic pollution because they just hate the Earth.

    They’re not cartoon villains like in Captain Planet that pollute just to make pollution.

    • Monkatronic@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      From what I understand, a lot of corporations have power over the options consumers have, the market isnt as free as this argument implies. For example, coal and fossil fuel lobbies do a lot to prevent sustainable alternatives from being adopted.

      The US doesnt rely on oil and coal because thats what consumers want, or because its necessarily the cheapest, its because the people that run those corporations have the means to subvert democracy. They are not cartoon villains, but they are absolutely villains.

      What you are saying is true for plastic straws and airlines, but I would guess it doesnt really apply to many of these 100 corporations

    • Smk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it’s that bad, then let’s make a law that fixes the problem.

      You can take this and just welp, plastic spoon is cheaper and all my concurrent are doing it so fuck it.

      We want a greener industry? Make the fucking law reflect that otherwise, fuck off.

      • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s almost as if regulations are needed because humans are incapable of doing the right thing to protect themselves. Fairly common thing I might add but you’d require a slightly larger government to do it and we can’t have that either.

    • complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re absolutely right. They aren’t cartoon villains. They’re just rational agents acting according to very real incentives.

      But where do these incentives come from? They depend on how we choose to organize our economy, what guiding principles our society follows in how to distribute resources, and harvest them from the environment.

      They come from our economic system. Our economic system is capitalism. And one of the many, many problems with capitalism — it can’t fucking slow down. In the eternal chase for greater and greater quarterly profits, there is no room for questions such as “is this growth sustainable?” or “I know there’s demand for this, but should we really be doing it?”.

      Pointing fingers and blaming people is, indeed, a waste of energy. Instead, it may be better to ask: “How do we incentivise people to change their behaviour? What about our system needs to change? And how quickly can we dismantle the oil companies?”

      • MrFagtron9000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We can’t incentivize people to change their behavior because no one is going to deliberately lower their quality of life.

        What politician is going to win on a platform of…

        Let’s make air travel so expensive that normal people can no longer regularly fly!

        Vote for me I’m going to double your electricity bill!

        You know that big SUV you love that is entirely impractical but you just like it because of how big it is… If you vote for me I’ll make gas $7 a gallon so that you can’t afford to have a giant SUV anymore.

        You know how you like to eat your Taco Bell nachos in your car with a plastic spork… If you vote for me I’ll replace the plastic spork with a cornstarch spork that starts to melt when you use it.

        The only thing that is going to save us is technology. Like air travel being fueled by biofuels, electricity costs kept somewhat normal by building new nuclear generation, giant SUVs being powered by batteries charged by nuclear/renewable energy, actually recycling the plastic spork.

  • BottleUpAndExplode@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is one of the most shittiest takes I’ve ever seen, trying to absolve oneselves of taking responsibility.

    Yeah, there are those companies that produce the bad shit but this tweet is right. If you stop eating meat, the companies that produce meat will produce less of it and there will be a real impact.

    I don’t know what the fuck the OP is thinking. Like, do they think that the corporations just produce pollution for fun? No, it’s because you buy that shit. If you stop buying that shit, pollution will go down. CNN was 100% right and that fucker that responded is retarded at best, but probably just braindead because what he posted doesn’t make sense at all.

  • aeternum@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can you imagine what would happen if you… stopped buying those products that those companies are selling that are responsible for the emissions? Nah, that’s crazy talk.