• iiGxC@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you didn’t realize the importance of privacy after the patriot act and seeing the continuation of right wing authoritarianism, it’s definitely time to get on board asap. Get yourself and your community on signal instead of texts and tuta or proton instead of regular email, use a vpn (mullvad or proton are solid), and dpending on what kinds of actions you may or may not be interested in, learn how to use tails os and tor (try to find a copy of the darknetmarket bible for a good intro)

    • recklessengagement@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve gotten nearly my entire circle on Signal and it’s incredibly satisfying. No more worrying about seeing ads based on my text conversations.

    • GadgeteerZA@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      @iiGxC@slrpnk.net don’t forget the CL:OUD Act either - that has serious privacy implications for countries outside the USA

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I think people outside the US are fair game

        If you don’t like it then don’t send your data to the US

    • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      patriot act and seeing the continuation of right wing authoritarianism

      The Patriot Act was an overwhelmingly bipartisan bill.

      • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s what happens when your two options for political parties are auth-left and auth-right.

    • greywolf0x1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Please don’t use Signal, the US government has all the keys. Self host XMPP, Matrix and SimpleX servers and make sure encryption is properly configured. If you’re not generating your encryption keys, why should you use them?

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t think Signal is unsafe, but agree that it is a weird middle ground. Depends on threat model, of course, but overall I would prefer something selfhostable - for the sake of independence, easier anonymity and censorship resistance. Plus, Signal by default doesn’t allow desktop registration (and desktops are much easier to make private than phones), so you’d need either a VM or a command-line application for it, which is a big pet peeve of mine.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think the best option is to communicate about alternatives. Maybe get a few close friends on each and then decide

      • Timber@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Source? And fyi, if you use Signal you are generating your own encryption keys. Your private keys are generated on your phone and stay on it. So what gives you the idea that

        the US government has all the keys

        ?? Sounds a lot like a conspiracy theory

        • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Plus, the signal client is open source. You can literally be 100% sure that your keys are being securely generated.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t want Authoritarianism period I don’t care if it is left or right. Specific political beliefs are a distraction

  • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why are Americans so focused on left vs right? Both parties are fascists they’re just trying to take away different rights for the time being.

    • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah the good guys are the centrists who want to continue the status quo: grind the poor people, make them pay fortunes for basic needs while making the rich richer.

    • glowie@h4x0r.host
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The Left think they’re morally superior… Prepare to be downvoted to oblivion kek

      Meanwhile, me a Libertarian Socialist laughs at both sides for being totalitarian in their own way.

      One of them lies about it while virtue signalling empty promises and the other says “what are you gonna do about it, huh? Yeah, that’s what I thought”

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        To bear arms.

        Also nobody seems interested in male reproductive rights.

        Also, have you seen how leftist moderators here on Lemmy behave?

        • hemmes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          To bear arms.

          No they’re not.

          Also nobody seems interested in male reproductive rights.

          Okay, I’ll bite. Like what?

          Also, have you seen how leftist moderators here on Lemmy behave?

          Do tell…

          • Mango@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Can you see yourself right now? You’re literally lying and discrediting purely based of personal impression, and that’s the same behavior your whole crowd has that I have a problem with.

              • Mango@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Do I really need a reference to point out your party’s major stances? FFS, do you even know them yourself, or do you just pick a color and root for your team like it’s sports?

                • hemmes@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Yes. You need a reference when you’re talking pure bullshit. None of that unfounded crap is on the democratic agenda. That’s why you can’t cite a single reference.

                  Bullshit like yours needs to be called out every time.

        • hemmes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I know you mean democrats, but that would be incorrect about the second amendment and freedom of association.

          Where’d you read that?

          • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            The blues have been spearheading the attempts to strip gun rights away for a decade. They’re the reason the ATF felt so comfortable changing rules randomly to turn millions of Americans into felons overnight. The most agregious recent example is the legality of arm braces. Although to be fair that gung ho attitude never changed when the reds were in office. Theyre more than content to let it happen.

            I did mispeak about freedom of association however. Turns out that’s also being spearheaded by the reds.

            • hemmes@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yeah, but you’re also wrong about the gun rights. They’re trying to act sensible loss, not strict gun rights.

              The most [egregious] recent example is the legality of arm braces.

              It’s not egregious, that’s called a sensible conversation.

              Why do gun fanatics need these types of guns anyway? What are you hunting, dragons? It’s so cringe to me when gun enthusiast get all upset about responsible gun laws - they just want to shoot everything and anything with the most firepower they can acquire. God forbid they have to earn the right to own such a weapon.

              • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Trying to apply justifications to the stripping of rights does not change the fact the rights are being eroded. Also if you think it’s okay to make millions of people felons overnight by the whim of unelected bureaucrats then this conversation clearly will go nowhere. Have a good day.

  • bloubz@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I never understand the presence of right wing people in privacy discussion actually. After everything they deliberately give up to either a fashist state or corporations

  • BuckFigotstheThird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I thought the left was the ones who cared, and the right was all like “If you dont have anything to hide you shouldnt be worried” bootlickers.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Declarations of an intent to reimagine social media are all well and good, but joining the actually existing Fediverse is probably a more effective place to start.

    It may not be precisely what you would’ve designed, not the People’s Democratic Social Media of your dreams, not exactly like whatever Tarnoff imagined, but it is what we’ve got and as it continues to evolve it has considerable potential for new kinds of Internet-based social organization.

    Organizing a boycott of Twitter is beside the point. All we need is for more people to join us in building up the better alternatives we already have. How is it even possible to put so much thought into the subject and not mention this?

    • pinjure@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Playing devil’s advocate here: bringing awareness to the problem (and explaining why it is a problem in the first place) to more people is a pretty important step into carrying out this ‘social media reform’. Ultimately though I do agree that at least some mention of viable alternatives like the Fediverse would’ve been nice.

  • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Are people are using WhatsApp, Discord and Instagram because it’s left or right, and not because that’s what they see everyone else is doing?

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I use discord because that’s what social circle use to communicate. No one is going to follow me if I switch apps or care about my suggestions.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Because that’s what the core of the group that are generally making all the plans want to use. Some of us were trying to get everyone to use signal instead a while back but it never went anywhere. At this point I’m just grateful they aren’t using facebook to coordinate everything. Or at least enough of them aren’t that I can still find out whats going on via discord.

          • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I suspect many people here are not the core of their social circles and that’s why they never make any progress. We should tell them to fix that first more.

            • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Not everyone has a personality suited to that. I certainly don’t and most people just aren’t that concerned with privacy. Just finding people that didn’t rely on Facebook was difficult for me. I don’t really have the time or energy to dedicate to convincing them to go further.

  • bad_alloc@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you truly believe you have nothing to hide, please post your full name and address, telephone number, email, bank balance, an assessment of your relationship to your parents and a link to your complete photo folder as a response to this comment.

    • Zakkull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      While i agree with the sentiment thats a ridiculous comparison. Thinking you have nothing to hide from the government is not the same as thinking you have nothing to hide from random entities on the internet. You already give the government all of that stuff when you literally just exist. Go get a social security card or a drivers license. Absolutely asinine to try to compare the two.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        But increasingly, the data you need to care about not being private isn’t from the govt. airs from those random entities. And their security is godawful.

          • TheFriar@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            …google, Microsoft, Facebook…need I go on?

            In the early 2000s, the issue was primarily the government. Patriot act made sure of that. And yeah, it’s still an issue with regards to the amount and types of data they’re storing and who the government is currently comprised of, but in 2024, the much larger privacy issue is from private data holdings. All those random fuckin apps you have, every cell phone carrier, every goddamn car now. Your data is the product now. And capitalism is the problem.

            • Zakkull@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Yes you need to go on. You dont just get to name apps and that just point blank proves your point lmfao. What is the data these places have that you didnt willingly give them that needs to be kept private

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I know my name will be on future lists when fascist purges start. Not because I’m some great though leader or anything. Just because they hate people with my beliefs.