• Mike1576218@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Aren’t all (most?) those centralized services? What good is having the app if the service is unavailable? Tox, Jamie and Veilidchat are fully decentralized, not just federated, fully decentralized. They come with their own downsides though…

      • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Apologies, yes Threema and Molly are centralized since they depend on proprietary servers. SimpleX and Briar are FOSS and P2P over TOR

        • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Correction. Briar is true p2p, while Simplex relies on servers - but said servers can be hosted by anyone and interoperate.

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, it was withdrawn, removed from the agenda so there was no vote, now it’s back on.

      • EntropyPure@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        To add on this: removed because it was clear the vote would not have been in favor.

        Was pretty clear that it would return sooner rather than later.

        • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          They will try until it passes. And if it’s stopped in the courts they will try again.

          • jaybone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            You guys should bring over some judges from the US courts. They will totally protect your freedoms.

            • doodledup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              You need to mark sarcasm with /s.

              If this is not a joke: the US has the worst privacy protection laws on this planet. Laws in China are almost better. And ironically the worst laws for freedom aswell. There is a reason why we have the GDPR laws in the EU that prohibits any user data transfer to US servers.

          • EntropyPure@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah, same with forcing ISPs to save connection data on all users long term. European court slapped on the hands a couple of times, still not done. Like some kind of undead policy

  • Papanca@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The content of this document is not accessible. Nevertheless, a request for access can be sent to the department.

      • Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This right here. We need to do the right thing over and over again, because once it passes it’s done.

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Literally how hackers operate.

        The hackers need to succeed once to get in. You need to succeed every time to not fail.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      thats because they want to watch you much much closer, but still pretend that decision was democratic. so they try again until we are too fed up to care.

    • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      From what I can glean, it’s another sort of mass surveillance, wherein the provider of a chat service would be required to monitor communications for “suspicious activity”

      Basically, the government is once again asking for unrestricted access to your personal life “for your own good”

      • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I always thought the “see something, say something” tag-line was creepy as fuck and don’t understand why everyone doesn’t get the same vibe. It’s common sense that if you see someone being harmed or in a harmful situation you speak up. But this is just a blanket “see something” which feels like a dog whistle for all the nosy and paranoid people to spy on everyone and it’s for the best. I guess we’ll have the same personalities in search algorithms going forward -_-

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Right there with you.

          Sadly, too many people don’t put in the mental effort to verify what they’re told.

          I suspect we’re all susceptible to this to greater/lesser degrees, and subject-dependent. I just can’t figure out my own blind spot around this.

      • CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        Italiano
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It still was a better time. No climate collapse, no mass surveillance, no Trump, no AI, pretty much nothing of this shit existed.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Dunno, my cousins’ dad was a 17yo soldier. One can say it was a better time cause he was on the winning side, and now that has become the losing side.

          Mass surveillance was more old-school, but governments were still pretty harsh.

          They had Trump. He just was younger, Democrat and apparently popular.

          They had AI in your spam mail.

          Climate collapse … again, where half my family is from, war broke logistics in the 90s, so to have heat at winter people would cut down trees. A lot of forest lost. But one can say it was a better time because “the world” cared more about civilians suffering than about forests. I suspect now climate activists would act differently.

          • CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            Italiano
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Again, no climate crisis + no mass surveillance + cheaper housing = do not give a shit. Were it for me, 70s, 80s and 90s on a loop forever. You lose something from the loop? Tough shit, your problem, not mine.

              • CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                Italiano
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yuuup. Sorry, whenever I complained about climate change on Reddit I was just shrugged with “oh well, too late, you’ll die”, “muh China/India/feedback loops”, “just move North”. So, they give me back the climate, the economy and the freedom of the 80s and then I’ll care again.

    • InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Depends on where you were in the 80s and 90s. If you were in America, the future EU, or Eastern Asia, for example, those were great times. If you were in Rwanda, Bosnia, or Afghanistan (The Soviet-Afgan war) I doubt many people call that peak humanity.

      • CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        Italiano
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yaddayaddayadda Rwanda yaddayaddayadda Bosnia, heard these bullshit excuses 1000 times. Not Rwandan or Yugoslavian therefore don’t care.

        • eclipse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          What excuses are you referring to?

          Are you also arguing that if a problem isn’t in your immediate periphery then it doesn’t exist? We are all human beings, living on the same planet.

          There’s nothing wrong with feeling a modicum of empathy for those less fortunate by circumstance of geography or socioeconomic influence.