• Reverendender@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    139
    ·
    1 year ago

    @fne8w2ah “Two of the central players of the operation, Roy M. Cox and Aaron Michael Jones, were under lifetime bans against making telemarketing calls following lawsuits by the Federal Trade Commission and State of Texas.”

    WHY AREN’T THEY IN JAIL

    • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How much money were they making off telemarketing that they were fucking banned for life from doing it and they still did it?

      Also:

      At the time, the FTC said that Cox was issued "a $1.1 million civil penalty that will be suspended due to his inability to pay.

      Oh ok, so this fine for more money will certainly mean something…

      • gullible@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel like we have places to put people who ruin society. Was it mail, rail, shale? I dunno, set them free and bring me a coffee, bailiff.

        • iyaerP@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel like at this point we just go full Spanish Inquisition and burn these motherfuckers at the stake.

      • Zeron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Political theatre to make it seem like they’re doing something about the issue. When in reality, nothing changes.

    • xodoh74984@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anyone got a number?

      I have some very important information for them regarding expiration of their vehicle warranties.

      • dan1101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        That would be a good penalty for them. Their phone number(s) must always be public so anyone can call them whenever they want.

    • pixelscience@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I don’t get why this seemed to be such a huge undertaking. The phone companies certainly know who’s making all these calls on their networks.

      • Toribor@corndog.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 year ago

        The phone companies certainly know who’s making all these calls on their networks.

        Exactly. If the networks faced consequences for knowingly routing and profiting off these illegal phone calls they would stop fairly quickly.

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      i assume someone was making money off this, and has made enough money to get rid of them so other people don’t make money…

  • rapscallion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s kind of amazing how we’d been answering phones when they rang for a century, until a handful of greedy wankers like these guys and the offshore “calling from Windows” folks started doing their thing a few years ago. Now only the elderly and folks required to answer for work even contemplate picking a call up.

    • Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t answer my work phone anymore. Our company uses teams. So if it’s not a teams call, you can’t make me answer the phone.

      • vortic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I haven’t had a legitimate phone call on my work line in the last 8 years. Anyone who truly needs to talk to me has my cell number and several other ways to contact me.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I got so many spam calls I considered changing the number I’ve had for over 2 decades. So obnoxious.

      • rapscallion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wouldn’t recommend that. I did it once for the same reason and got just as many spam calls plus debt collectors trying to reach the person who had the number before me.

  • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Good to see the FCC going after this kind of thing. Put them in jail even better.

    I have my phone set up so the only numbers that chime the phone are those in my contact list. The abuse of voice and text on the cell network is rampant and it’s equivalent to trespassing.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    “An international network of companies violated federal statutes and the Commission’s regulations when they executed a scheme to make more than five billion robocalls to more than 500 million phone numbers during a three-month span in 2021, including violating federal spoofing laws by using more than one million different caller ID numbers in an attempt to disguise the true origin of the robocalls and trick victims into answering the phone,” the FCC said.

    “Since at least 2018, this enterprise operated a complex scheme designed to facilitate the sale of vehicle service contracts under the false and misleading claim of selling auto warranties,” the FCC said.

    “Two of the central players of the operation, Roy M. Cox and Aaron Michael Jones, were under lifetime bans against making telemarketing calls following lawsuits by the Federal Trade Commission and State of Texas.”

    The FCC said it took action to block the robocalling scheme last year by directing "all US-based voice service providers to cease carrying traffic associated with certain members of the enterprise.

    The FCC coordinated last year’s action with the Ohio attorney general’s office, which filed a lawsuit against Jones, Cox, and others involved in the alleged robocalling scheme.

    Cox was banned from telemarketing in a 2013 settlement with the FTC, which accused him of sending “illegal robocalls offering credit card interest rate reduction programs, extended automobile warranties, and home security systems.”


    I’m a bot and I’m open source!

      • Parabola@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        BEEP BOOP. Omega-TLDR bot activated.

        Two trash humans were asked nicely to not do it again, and did it again. don’t worry though the prison cells they should have been locked away in are filled with minor drug charges by minorities or something else equally stupid.

  • aufheben@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fines aren’t near enough at this point, we need public executions at a minimum to put a dent in this problem.

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No killing them is too extreme. Put them in a room with 1,000 different types of ringing telephones for a week.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The way I see it, an alleged murderer is entitled to a trial by an impartial jury of one’s peers. However, It would be improper for victims of the deceased to serve on the jury trying the murder case.

      When the deceased has continuously harassed everyone with a phone for the past 20+ years, it is impossible to assemble an impartial jury. Impossible to assemble a jury means it is also impossible to convict.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not gonna help. Not accepting calls from unknown numbers and/or automated filtering is the only way forward, the model of being able to just call anyone is broken.

  • Sensitivezombie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ban all robocalls, legal or illegal. If any business that needs to reach can leave a voicemail. I’ll decide then which should be deleted and which required a call back.

  • exohuman@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How many of you have received these calls? I got a ton of them along with my husband and siblings.

      • CoderKat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Spam callers have basically ruined telephone as a medium. For many, a phone call is more likely to be fake and spam than it is to be legitimate. And even if the call claims to come from a source you might trust, good odds it’s spoofed and thus cannot in fact be trusted.

        A shame on telecoms for not being willing to tackle the problem.

        • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Both email and the telephone have been ruined by spam for me. The inbox has become an unwieldy, inefficient mess.

          • ElectroNeutrino@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            At least email has some tools to help mitigate the issue, like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. They aren’t perfect, but they are loads better than telephony.

              • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’ve never gotten that to work. Did Gmail remove the ability to do it? I’m probably just dumb.

                • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It should still work. It’s become kind of a common pattern. I’ve found it works in Proton Mail too which is nice.

          • Pandemanium@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m even getting Google Drive spam now. Complete randos “sharing files” with me. There’s no way to prevent it.

        • RivenRise@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Job hunting is the worst. I have to answer every single call for a while knowing full well it’s probably a telemarketer but not having any other choice.

    • fatboy93@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve started forwarding the calls to Google voice or if i accidentally pick the call, i use bixby’s auto answer.

      Either eay the call drops in a hot second.

  • 🧋 Teh C Peng Siu Dai@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    $300M feels like “Ahh we caught you now, bad boys, don’t let me catch you again. Now go have your lunch.”

    These people should be punished harsher for all the lives they’ve destroyed intentionally.

    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Cox was banned from telemarketing in a 2013 settlement with the FTC, which accused him of sending “illegal robocalls offering credit card interest rate reduction programs, extended automobile warranties, and home security systems.” At the time, the FTC said that Cox was issued “a $1.1 million civil penalty that will be suspended due to his inability to pay.”

      In 2017, the FTC obtained a similar telemarketing ban on Jones. He was also fined $2.7 million, but, as with Cox, the fine was “suspended based on his inability to pay.”

      No fine is going to be paid this time either I imagine.

      • st3ph3n@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not normally a proponent of prison for debtors, but in the case of these motherfuckers I’d be happy if they threw away the key.

      • dan1101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        suspended based on his inability to pay

        If only he had some way to make money fast.

    • Parallax@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Maybe it’ll help as long as the fine is some % of their net income. Sweden does this, speeding tickets are a % of your income instead of a fixed fine, so someone with $10MM will still feel the burn.

    • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Depends on if they make so much money that 300M is just cost of doing business. There needs to be prison time for those involved.

      Also $300M is the public fine number. Usually the actual fine is less than what is made public.

      • gullible@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just expanding on this, you can robocall anyone with whom you have personal or business dealings but must cease immediately when requested.

        • Gikiski@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This needs a time limitation. Just you and I transacted something back in the 1900s does not mean I should receive a robocall from you out of the blue.

          • gullible@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There might be a timeout but I’m not sure. Much of the legislation around it is similar to what you find in the do not call registry. We live in exciting times, when incredibly outdated laws are finally being updated. Send a suggestion to your local lawmakers if you want change.