• rush@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    209
    ·
    1 year ago

    Common Re-Logic W

    Seriously though, whilst the budget they can give to Godot and FNA is small compared to what other, bigger devs/publishers could give, I find their commitment remarkable and very much in-line with their goal of empowering developers and gamers alike

    We need more publishers doing things like this

    • akatsukilevi@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      89
      ·
      1 year ago

      Considering FNA and Godot, $100K is gonna do wonders to both projects, specially with the additional $1K
      They might even better afford to have developers working full-time at the engines, or deal with stuff like infrastructure, licensing, hosting and other costs

      • rush@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        True! Considering Godot and FNA’s current size this is indeed going to catapult them to a different league, which I guess is what Re-Logic was setting out to do :P

        • Quokka@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          It won’t change Godot.

          Epic donated $250,000 in 2020, Kefir donated $120,000 in 2021. Godot Devs started W4 games and raised $8.5m of which their goal is to support Godots growth.

          $100,000 is nice and will allow them to continue but it’s not “league changing” money or anything for them.

          • rush@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You‘re forgetting that this doesn‘t only come with money, but also free press, which is sometimes worth more as it would expose more people to Godot‘s existence, any of which may potentially donate :P

  • darthelmet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    172
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s crazy how successful they’ve been off just making and selling a good indie game. They’re still doing free updates AND they can afford a $200k donation?

    • PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 year ago

      They came out around peak indie craze, 14 or so years ago. I believe they were just behind Minecraft in terms of success. Total lifetime sales for their game have it outselling Skyrim.

    • chic_luke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s time to dust off Terraria and go on a nice run again.

      Edit: I will, of course, be first in line to buy any new games they release. They donated $100k to a FOSS project I love, I can give some of my disposable income back to then.

    • stephenc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      One of the, if not the best games in the last 15+ years.

      I’m not exaggerating. At all. I am not a fan of a vast majority of “popular” modern games and think gaming has been on the decline since the mid-90s. In a massive pile of garbage “AAA” and “modern indie” titles, Terraria is the one shining, beautiful, wonderful spot that just gets gameplay right, with no gimmicks, no BS, no boring intrusive story, nothing but good, solid gameplay.

      It’s one of my favorite games of all time. So all this makes me very happy.

      • cjsolx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Out of curiosity can you define “no boring intrusive story”? Because personally I’m big on storylines, so if they nail that part then that takes the game to a whole other level

        • wahming@monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, no story period. Which is good for some people, not so much for others

          • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I tried playing Terraria but gave up after an hour or so, precisely because I expected at least some kind of story and there wasn’t. It was also very awkward to control with a mouse and keyboard, I think it’s really supposed to be played with a controller. I might try it again now that I’ve got one, and less expectations

        • scv@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          In some games storyline matters, in others… not so much. Games with a storyline trend to be less replayable in my experience. One exception I can think of is This War of Mine, that game is really depressing.

  • FrostKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    1 year ago

    Re-Logic have always been my favorite group of devs in the industry. This is yet another item to add to my long list of reasons for that.

    Putting their money where their mouth is.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What an incredibly kind move by the Terraria developers. This is part of why Terraria is awesome!

  • egeres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    This reminds me of a time when the blender fund was opened and at some point a bunch of companies jumped to donate money (steam, epic, google, AMD…) this was way back when 2.8 was getting in shape. Years later we saw the fruits of that labor with the 3.x series bringing nice improvements and refactors that were done over the course of many months and years

    We probably won’t see a huge push in godot’s quality in what’s left of this year, but maybe in 2024 and later

  • NanoooK@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really good of them. I wish some others developers do the same, it’d be really great for the open source engines.

  • The Barto@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I love the part where they’re like " we don’t even use unity except for some random assets", just a nice fuck you cherry on top.

    • hook@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, I like playing video games and this will affect the video games I like playing.

      I’m not a game developer, but if Unity got everyone to roll over with that TOS change I’m sure that devs would use this as a new justification to increase costs for games or higher subscription fees for services like Gamepass.

      It’s important to be invested and informed in the things that matter to you.

      • GCostanzaStepOnMe@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        91
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, but through like two to three layers of abstraction. I like beer, but I don’t give a shit about the contractual details of malt distribution. Games are still gonna be made, this is just something for people to project their impotent rage at.

        • lobut@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          49
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not a game dev but I’m a dev so I can easily see how this can affect them.

          If you’re uninterested that’s fine, no need to insult those that do.

        • Algaroth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hi. I’m a brewer. You might not care about malt distribution but maybe you can understand that a lot of breweries run on small margins. If we suddenly have to pay a lot more for malt we will either have to raise our prices or go out of business. Raising prices might also drive us out of business because less people will be inclined to buy our beer. So it does affect you as a consumer, whether you care or not.

          • GCostanzaStepOnMe@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            25
            ·
            1 year ago

            We live in a society. Everything affects the consumer, doesn’t mean I have to care about everything. Distribution of malt is your problem, not mine.

            • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Wow you’re so detached and cool bro… like you just don’t care.

              Wow bro that’s so cool of you how you don’t care about things, can I suck you off or do you not care about that either

            • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Except it becomes your problem if beer suddenly starts getting priced higher and higher and higher over time to the point where you can’t afford it anymore?

        • shortypig@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well shit. Some people actually care about the people who produce whatever it is you consume. It’s crazy, I know. If the people who are growing the malt for my beer, or processing it, or delivering it, or whatever… are getting screwed over I would be equally concerned. But by all means, continue to be a consumer pacman just gobbling up whatever it is that falls in front of your face. That’s what the world is trying to mold you into anyway. Why fight it?

          • GCostanzaStepOnMe@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            52
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Oh please get over yourself. If you consume games you are already actively supporting the screwing over of people in like five different industries the world over. This price hike in one piece of software is just your “thing” to get righteously mad about this week.

        • Gray@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If the contractual details of malt distribution were going to affect the quality of beers you were getting then you absolutely would care. Unity’s pay scheme will lead to studios shutting down if there isn’t pushback. Studios switching to a different engine like Godot will make their games feel different for better or for worse and efforts to help fund these alternate engines will help tip the scale towards that being “for better”.

          But most importantly of all, this is a company using toxic and predatory practices. Regardless of the industry (yes, malt distributors too), if we don’t push back against toxic business practices, then companies in many different industries will see avenues they can take advantage of to make extra money. These ideas don’t hang in isolation. If Unity’s scheme works, other businesses will learn from it. This is the reality of capitalism. Whatever methods can turn a profit without generating negative attention will be employed. It’s in the hands of consumers, competing businesses, and the government to keep those toxic practices in check. I mean, why the fuck are we on Lemmy? Ultimately Reddit’s actions are not going to affect the majority of users on their platform. Most of us came here to protest shitty business practices.

        • nightm4re@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is not a great comparison tbh. Unity are not distributing a resource, you could rather compare them to a company building the motor for the car you use. Even as the end customer, their product is clearly perceivable and distinguishable from competitors’ products. You don’t need to build cars to have an opinion on Unity motors and the ethics of their business. And if they fuck every contractor over and abuse their power in the market to retroactively charge additional fees for every time someone starts a car with their motor in it, of course you would be directly hit with the consequences as a customer. Therefore, it is justified to not leave this discussion to car manufacturers, but to 1. let unity motors know that they can go fuck themselves and 2. to support more ethical motor manufacturers in the future by buying cars built with them.

        • TulipanJones@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          I like coffee, but I prefer to source my beans from places I can trust. People lost trust in Unity so they ain’t gonna use the engine anymore. Blown out of proportion? Yeah maybe, but I agree with the core concept

            • sirfancy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              23
              ·
              1 year ago

              …what. He just made an analogy about not consuming unethical beans. That’s literally his point. So no, he does not consume the beans.

    • Retro_Unlimited@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read today that about half the games are made with unity, imagine if most of those pulled the games you purchased so it can’t be installed again. That is a huge hit to gaming.

      • PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        7 Days to Die, Escape from Tarkov, Wasteland 2, Pathfinder: Kingmaker, Cities: Skylines, Dungeons 3, Cult of the Lamb, Endless Space 1 and 2, Outerwilds,

      • GCostanzaStepOnMe@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well they obviously won’t. It’s always the same with these things, they either come to terms, or the producers will pay up, or the reports are overblown or whatever. Just like reddit didn’t lose half its userbase after the API switch, or Youtube doesn’t crumble because everyone throws a fit when they add another commercial slot or whatever. But thank god we’re all really really invested in something that is essentially corporate politics.

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s not corporate politics if it’s going to have an effect on the end users. You’d be surprised at how big of an impact this will have, if they don’t backpedal this and cancel it entirely, and even if they do it could still an impact.

    • stopthatgirl7@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah? Even ignoring how the results of this will determine how companies try this is the future (because they WILL), this shit is like classical Greek drama, watching someone fall because of their hubris.