DENVER (AP) — The Colorado judge overseeing the first significant lawsuit to bar former President Donald Trump from the state’s 2024 presidential ballot on Friday issued a protective order prohibiting threats and intimidation in the case, saying the safety of those involved — including herself and her staff — was necessary as the groundbreaking litigation moves forward.

“I 100% understand everybody’s concerns for the parties, the lawyers, and frankly myself and my staff based on what we’ve seen in other cases,” District Judge Sarah B. Wallace said as she agreed to the protective order.

The order prohibits parties in the case from making threatening or intimidating statements. Scott Gessler, a former Colorado secretary of state representing Trump in the case, opposed it. He said a protective order was unnecessary because threats and intimidation already are prohibited by law.

    • MCk3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Per the article:

      Scott Gessler, a former Colorado secretary of state representing Trump in the case, opposed it. He said a protective order was unnecessary because threats and intimidation already are prohibited by law.

  • TheJims@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trumps violent group of degenerates certainly will do anything to protect Trump from justice.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      In their world, Trump won, their party did things to secure elections, now that surely Trump will win, the Democrats are creating “trumped up” charges to prevent him from even running and trying to throw him in jail.

      … I can understand why someone who sees the world that way would be very very angry about this. It’s not factually accurate, but I understand the perspective.

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Party of “law and order” will think of this is a political move rather then a criminal actually facing penalties for commiting numerous serious crimes he’s been indicted with in court.

    • Cerbero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Law and order for thee but not for me. Just look at what the GOP is doing with the electoral maps in Ohio and the SC justice in WI. They don’t believe in law and order they believe everyone should obey them abd be ruled by them anything else is seen as illegitimate to them.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    DENVER (AP) — The Colorado judge overseeing the first significant lawsuit to bar former President Donald Trump from the state’s 2024 presidential ballot on Friday issued a protective order prohibiting threats and intimidation in the case, saying the safety of those involved — including herself and her staff — was necessary as the groundbreaking litigation moves forward.

    “I 100% understand everybody’s concerns for the parties, the lawyers, and frankly myself and my staff based on what we’ve seen in other cases,” District Judge Sarah B. Wallace said as she agreed to the protective order.

    It was sought by lawyers for the liberal group Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which is seeking to disqualify Trump from the ballot under a rarely used Civil War-era clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

    Dozens of lawsuits have been filed around the country seeking to disqualify Trump from the 2024 ballot based on the 14th Amendment clause barring anyone who swore an oath to the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection” against it from running for office.

    Wallace has set an Oct. 30 hearing to discuss whether Trump needs to be removed under Colorado law prohibiting candidates who don’t meet qualifications for higher office from appearing on ballots.

    He cited federal prosecutor Jack Smith last week seeking a gag order against Trump for threats made in his prosecution of the former president for trying to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.


    The original article contains 541 words, the summary contains 241 words. Saved 55%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait what kind of hell hole do we live in where the government can ban people from the ballot of a private club? To be clear to the liberals here, the DNC and the GOP are NOT governmental organizations, and Primary’s have nothing to do with our constitution or voting rights. Plus as was established in 2016, the primary vote itself is 100% optional by the parties involved. They could skip them all together, and just decide to run Trump as their nominee, and there is nothing the Federal Government can do about that. So what the fuck is this case?