• AdmiralShat@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re coming in with their alts now. If you check some of the profiles on here, look how often China is mentioned and tell me it’s not just obviously Hexbear users with alts

    • Carcosa@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Did you read past the post title before firing up your meme folder to participate?

      In earlier correspondence with The Telegraph, Dr Peter Daszak, the British zoologist and president of EcoHealth Alliance, said that its work >with WIV did not fall under restricted gain-of-function research.

      “None of the work changed animal viruses so they can infect humans – they only infected human cell cultures and that’s a big difference,” >said Dr Daszak.

      He also said the experiments were exempt because the original viruses were not infectious to humans.

      However, White House officials told The Telegraph the work did fall under gain-of-function rules and would have required review.

      Gerald Epstein, former assistant director for biosecurity and emerging technologies at the White House Office of Science and Technology >Police between 2016 and 2018, said: “I oversaw development of the US government’s enhanced potential pandemic pathogens (ePPP) >policy usually referred to as gain-of-function.

      “EcoHealth claimed that their work engineering bat coronaviruses could not have been ePPP research because the original viruses were >not pathogenic to humans. That is apparently their position, but it is clearly incorrect.”

      So Epstein (lol) a man who works with the US government is claiming that a lab he has never visited has violated the ePPP policy, while a >researcher WHO did work there and is NOT Chinese is stating that it didn’t.

      There is just as much evidence that the leak came from Fort Detrick however the “lab leak theory” for COVID is cope and not relevant to the average person especially since the world has decided the pandemic is over, to stop masking, testing, or providing immunizations.

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know why anyone is still talking about a lab outbreak in Wuhan because of the wet market nearby being suspected in mid December, when we know for sure that Covid was in Italy in September/October and possibly as early as May. The world just shrugged at this info because faecal treatment samples aren’t as interesting as as bat soup and bioterrorism.

      • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Racism mostly. Easier to just be racist against the Chinese than to admit COVID is the result of something more nuanced and systemic

        • Zorque@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s also about laziness. It’s much less effort to just point a finger than to think about the complexities of a situation.

          • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s also really easy to dismiss the uncomfortable origin (It came from a Chinese lab) and point to the “complexities of the situation” instead.

          • PosadistInevitablity [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “We don’t hate the Chinese just the government that they like and has made their people prosperous.”

            Check what happened to the Russians after the Soviet Union fell and tell me it’s not hate to wish that on the Chinese next.

            • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The USSR (Stalin mostly) broke the Russian people, which is why they’re so weak after its fall.

              The CCP broke the Chinese people too. Seems like a common theme.

              • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                “I’m not racist, nobody has a problem with Chinese people.”

                “Also, the Chinese are wild animals that were broken and domesticated.”

                Okay there, buckaroo. Keep telling yourself that.

              • TheGamingLuddite [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                What does it mean to “break” a people?

                The Chinese people were certainly already “broken” in 1949. They had undergone a century of collapse, most were illiterate, women were essentially chattel, and every single grain of wheat or rice more than what was required to keep them alive was stolen by unelected landlords.

                The communists took power and every single one of them was taught to read, women were enfranchised, no-fault divorce and abortion were legalized, political rights were expanded, opium and gangs were chased out of the mainland and the feudal lords were held to account.

                30 years after the revolution they had turned a society of feudal peasants into a nuclear power, 30 years after that and it’s the world’s largest economy by PPP.

                The same things can be said about the Bolsheviks, who defeated a nazi army which sought to annihilate them.

                • GenderIsOpSec [she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  stalin-comical-spoon going around people’s houses, knocking on doors and telling them that stroganoff had to be made with pork now to break them mentally. it’s true, my grandma told me cri

              • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I’m not racist, but here’s my thoughts generalizing entire populations of millions as “weak people” because of their Asiatic brainpans.

          • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And by every major polling organizations metrics the Chinese people overwhelmingly approve of the CPC.

            Typical westoid wants to destroy a government that is liked by it’s people. What’s your countries government approval rating? Do you want to overthrow your government too?

            • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I worked there for a good while.

              They don’t hate it, they treat it like the weather, something to fear, but nothing you can do anything about.

              The CCP broke them completely, much like the USSR broke the Russian people.

              • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                I worked there for a good while.

                Tell us of the deep abiding wisdom you gained from teaching English at a barely-regulated “school” for 12 months.

          • deft@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “signaling that it might have spread beyond China earlier than thought.”

            they still suggest Chinese origin

            • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well, no, it’s not an “idea”. It just means there’s nothing special about Wuhan that should make us look at everything there as a suspect.

              • alternative_factor@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                You are wrong, the assumption of people who post this is that there wasn’t COVID-19 in China before the CCP announced it was around.

                • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re the one making assumptions I’m afraid.

                  We don’t know where Covid-19 came from. That is the outcome. It quite well could have come from China. We have no idea. What we do know is that it didn’t spread globally from a wet market in Wuhan that happens to be near a virology research centre. Because that idea hangs entirely on it appearing there first in December.

                  Covid-19 could have started in China. Or Italy. Or anywhere. We don’t know, and as a species we seem to be very reluctant to find out - we’ve just accepted bat soup or bioterrorism and just moved on. Meaning that we’ve learned absolutely nothing to prevent it happening again.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the thing, the COVID conspiracy people now posting this shirt saying, “SEE!?! IT WAS LAB LEAK!!” as if that justifies every single other insane thing they’ve ever said about COVID. Because there’s a huge difference between “covid CAME FROM a lab” and “lab leak possible origin.” One implies conspiracy, the other implies carelessness. What’s the old saying? ‘Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to greed?’ I very much think the same applies to stupidity—and honestly, in this case, greed probably caused the stupidity. How much funding-slashing has led to calamity in recent times? Plenty.

      • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the lab with a long record of carelessness leaking the virus by accident is entirely plausible if not the most reasonable explanation. The issue is not so much about how/when it was leaked, but more along the lines of how poorly they handled the whole situation and subsequent coverup. For all we know, it could have been leaked by accident way earlier.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the lab with a long record of carelessness leaking the virus by accident is entirely plausible if not the most reasonable explanation

          I personally don’t think it came from Detrick, but I don’t fault you for thinking so

          • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It came from the lab in Wuhan, not Detrick. We shall never really know since every govt, especially China will deny and cover up the truth.

            • CombatLiberalism [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              1 year ago

              It didn’t come from a lab in Wuhan, it was first discovered in Wuhan but was already going around in Italy for months at that point based on waste samples.

              The point was that we have just as much evidence to say it came from Detrick as we do to say it came from a Chinese lab. It most likely didn’t come from either, but only one of these conspiracies gets pushed. If you provide any pushback that maybe China isn’t responsible for COVID you get met with “well they would lie and cover it up, so I might as well be right”

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I don’t really have any issues with accepting a lab leak possibility, but the lab leak people generally add a whole bunch of other conspiracies on top of that (it was designed as a bioweapon, leaked intentionally, etc), and nobody can really explain why this would be any good as a bioweapon if it hurts you as much as your enemies, and if you release it without having a vaccine for it.

          • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think the bio weapon part is from people who don’t understand what research is going on lab. They hear “gain of function” research and immediately think Resident Evil type bio weapon.

            Not that I agree that type of research is good for us to be doing in the first place. But I do understand the reason we do that type if research is to learn about viruses and how to combat them as they mutate. I think it’s stupid to be doing that type of research anywhere, especially finding China.

            • notacat@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              “Gain of function” is an extremely broad category that is an absolutely necessary part of molecular biology research.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly The issue is how China handled all of this. America has had leaks before as have other countries. China has several well known leaks.

          China is still trying to hide the origins which to me heavily suggest a lab leak.

    • Silverseren@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It came from the wild. They, along with Germany and other labs, were researching Sars related wild vectors and the possibility of natural selection causing a new outbreak.

      I find it reasonable to believe a biosafety incident at the Wuhan lab infected several of the lab researchers and that led to the pandemic.

      But that’s the extent of where things go. Conspiracies about bioweapons are idiotic.

      • AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I remembered reading early on that someone sold a carcass from the lab to a wet market. I think that’s probably Western propaganda and I have no idea whether that’s true.

        However, in China there were posters in every restaurant saying to avoid eating such meats. They started to appear in the first half of 2020. I saw them in Shanghai, Ningbo, and Hangzhou.

        Maybe the government just saw it as a useful opportunity to steer the public toward factory-produced meats that fall under the “safe umbrella” of capitalism. Either one is interesting to think about

  • Farman [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    What if covid was a terrorist atack on china and iran by obama loyalists? With the aded benefit ithat it put them back in power.

    • Silverseren@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The US funds research on a variety of subjects around the world, many of them only being possible to be researched locally because they are on local diseases and pathogens.

    • HMH@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Less regulations, it’s easier to do “funny stuff” like gain of function research (frankly a euphemism for biological warfare research) in China than in the US. And it’s not like the US is just funding the biolab, they have people on site and oversight as well.

  • zephyreks@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah yes, because it’s not like there are any geopolitical reasons that might explain why the NIH would want to decouple from China.

    Fact is, you can find infractions from any lab. It’s just a question of whether you want to look.

    • justdoit@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No self-respecting scientist concluded that either a natural origin or a lab leak were the definitive cause of the pandemic. This is clear if you actually read scientific literature. It’s why phrases akin to “the most supported hypothesis is X” or “the Y theory is unlikely without more supporting evidence” are used. Both hypotheses were and are still possible explanations.

      It’s people who get their scientific info from sources like the Telegraph that keep jumping to conclusions. Or people who don’t understand what a section leader at the NIH does, how research grants work, or what gain of function research is. You know, like yourself.

    • Silverseren@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The gain of function research on the same wild virus being done in conjunction with Germany?

      Do you know any of the actual details of the project, where they were collecting wild bats infected with the proto version of Covid and were splitting up different components of the research to different labs?

      The Wuhan group were researching the viral backbone and Germany the viral antigens.

      The same sort of collaboration done on many other potentially concerning natural vector diseases.

      • TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        I question narratives and I’m met by insults. If the people responding had any evidence or were secure in their narrative they wouldn’t need to resort to insults first.

    • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have they found an animal with a strain related to the human variant? Isn’t that the main evidence they expect to be able to find to help prove it actually had a path from animal to human?

      • TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        If so, I haven’t seen it. As far as I can tell, investigating the narrative is off limits. You can see how every person who has responded to my questioning has attacked me on a personal level.

        • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I figured Johnny Harris was giving a decent take on the whole situation when I watched his video on the topic.

          And while I can’t recall the details right now, I have read and watched stuff about Harris that does call into question his biases. At the same time, I don’t believe anyone has said anything against his factual accuracy. But the slant of a presentation and possibly excluded information can do quite a bit for undermining a narrative if you really want to do that.

          Plus, it’s it like I’m gonna do anything useful with my opinion on the topic…. So I’m not going to waste time seriously investing in researching the topic.