Europe gives Elon Musk 24 hours to respond about Israel-Hamas war misinformation and violence on X::Thierry Breton, the European commissioner for the internal market, warns Elon Musk about disinformation on X related to the Israel-Hamas conflict.

    • Syrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Failure to comply with the European regulations around illegal content could result in fines worth 6% of a company’s annual revenue.

      “I remind you that following the opening of a potential investigation and a finding of non-compliance, penalties can be imposed,” Breton wrote.

      The second might be just talk but the first one is very much “something”.

      • Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Since Twitter lost $20 billion in value this year, he would argue that means the EU owes Twitter $1.2 billion.

        Edit: Yes, revenue vs profit. I get it. It was a joke.

        • English Mobster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          9 months ago

          Revenue, not profit.

          In other words - Twitter would lose even more money. And they’d lose it to people that can take it straight from their bank accounts. 6% of it, to start with.

          So $0.48 of every blue checkmark would go straight to the EU.

          • Treczoks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            And, IIRC the penalty is based on last years or accounting periods data, i.e, from times where they still earned money.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Since Twitter lost $20 billion in value this year, he would argue that means the EU owes Twitter $1.2 billion.

          Edit: Yes, revenue vs profit. I get it. It was a joke.

          Wouldn’t surprise me if that was Elon’s “strategy” here.

  • ram@bookwormstory.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 months ago

    I hope they have the PR for when he misses the deadline already written up so they can just hit “Publish” when he fails to respond.

  • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    He doesn’t have time for that, after all he’s the busiest man on the planet and earns his billions every day.

    Which is why his Diablo 4 Druid is level 100. Lol.

    • Nighed@sffa.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      If your going to bash him, don’t do it for him playing computer games.

      …there are plenty of proper reasons!

      • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s not the point. The point is that oligarchs always go on about how hard they work, which makes them somehow deserve all the wealth they’ve swindled us out of. But if you work so hard, you won’t have time to sink endless hours into a game.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Why do you know what level he has in some game? Why are people so obsessed with Elon in general? Ignore that clown.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    Failure to comply with the European regulations around illegal content could result in fines worth 6% of a company’s annual revenue.

    I guess joke’s on the EU…

    • PixxlMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Because they aren’t making much money? Considering this isn’t based on profit but revenue, that’s a pretty significant fine

  • w2qw@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Thierry Breton, the European commissioner for the internal market, said in a letter addressed to Musk on Tuesday that his office has “indications” that groups are spreading misinformation and “violent and terrorist” content on X, and urged the billionaire to respond within a 24-hour period.”

    Sounds like it’s just a strongly worded letter.

  • unconsciousvoidling@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The saudis might give him money to mitigate fines. I’m sure that’s not beyond him to continue with a misinformation campaign if the price is right.

    • Syrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well, more money for the EU and less for the Saudis wouldn’t be a bad outcome either.

  • DuncanIdaho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Nevermind fining Twitter. Elon will see it as a badge of honour and Trumpspin.

    What the EU needs to do is block access to the website outright across its member states.

      • Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        We tried not censoring the internet and it hasn’t worked

        If it makes you feel better, think of it as Europe defederating from Twitter

        • LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Whoever chooses which sites get banned from the internet has a whole load of power. They could feasibly, in time, become corrupt and end up banning threats to corporate monopolies, like the Fediverse.

          • locuester@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            They will become corrupt over time. Power and money yield corruption. Always.

            • LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Exactly. So I wouldn’t trust anyone with the power to dictate which websites you can visit and which you can’t

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Ya and ban all forms of protest against apartheid.

        That’s the EU and it would be the US too if we didn’t have the first amendment

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s 6% of world-wide turnover, not EU revenue. The neat part about turnover is that you can’t play shenanigans with accounting. It’s very unlikely to be the full 6% though and they will want to keep some headroom for escalation and even more egregious cases.

      But yes this is absolutely “drive a company bankrupt” kind of territory and that’s precisely the intention. Either Twitter shapes up, leaves the EU market, or gets fined into non-existence.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    He’ll fuck this up. I look forward to reading the EU’s chastising later today.

    Let’s go Lonnie (you stupid piece of shit), Let’s go!

  • Critical_Insight@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m having real hard time trying to understand what kind of “misinformation and violence” is spreading on twitter, that isn’t on other social media platforms such as right here. I wonder what even counts as “misinformation” at this point, as you can make quite outrageous but factual claims about both sides (Israeli government and hamas)

    This is the most confusing conflict I’ve ever paid any significant attention to, and it feels like the more I learn, the less I understand.

    • FISHNETS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I would argue a major difference between misinformation on some place like Lemmy and misinformation on Twitter, is that Musk as owner of Twitter is amplifying this misinformation. Elon Musk frequently replies to people spreading misinfo and shouts out their accounts.

      • Critical_Insight@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        What if it was some other celebrity with similarly large following doing that on some other platform?

        I don’t quite buy that explanation. Basically the same thing is happening elsewhere too but instead of it being done by a single individual it’s done by many. The end result is just the same.