The Archduke Conference has come to an end, but Ehrenfest’s archducal family is still reeling from the troubles it brought. Rozemyne has one year before she must depart for the Sovereignty, and those in her service have an important choice to make.
I wouldn’t be so sure trug was involved.
We’ve heard how brazenly treasonous Detline speaks, even in the presence of a member of the royal family (remember how Magdalena was ready to have her executed and could just barely contain herself after the meeting). So it wouldn’t be too surprising if some Sovereign knights (maybe of Dunkelfelger origin, since they tend to be rather emotional for nobles) couldn’t take the insults and saw red.
Considering how Detlinde complained that also a member of the royal family, and not just knights, bared a weapon against her, I’m near enough sure that is what happened.
Though after everything we’ve learned last volume, I wouldn’t be surprised if the knights that lost their temper had been under the after effects of trug, contributing to their short fuse.
Alternatively, through far less likely, it might all have been a setup to get rid of those two knights that died specifically. Either they were getting too close to the traitor, or they were associates of the traitor, that a loyalist wanted to get rid of.
Which brings me neatly to Raublut: I’m still very unsure about him. On one hand we have been given plenty of reason to be suspicious of him, but at the same time we have been given almost too much reason to be suspicious of him. In most other franchises I would say, he is so obviously set up as the villain, that it’s going to be a misdirect and he’ll turn out to be loyal after all… but then we do have Georgine, Detlinde, Veronica, Bezewanst and more, who proof that oftentimes the obvious is just that, obvious in this story.
I can still see routes of him being either loyal or a traitor. We know that there is a traitor either within, or very close to the royal family. That traitor might be Raublut himself. Maybe he was never loyal to Waldifried, but was placed in his service as a sleeper agent by the first prince and complicit in the second princes death.
Or he could be a traitor, exactly because of his loyalty. He was devoting his live to Waldifried and when his master was killed by no one less than the prince’s own flesh-and-blood brother (well, half-brother anyway), Raublut became convinced that other than his dead master, the royal family is corrupt to the core and so he stated a long-term plan of wiping them all out… maybe with the exception of Hildebrand, who’s just too innocent to be considered corrupt.
Or on the loyalty side, he might be acting under his own initiative, without the permission or knowledge of the royal family, since he deduced that there is a traitor within the closest circles of the royal family, but he wasn’t able to identify them yet, so he feels like he can trust nobody and needs to be suspicious of everyone.
I’m really looking forward to see, where this is going. It’d be especially satisfying, if he was loyal and ended up working with Ferdinand and Rozemyne, to lay the actual traitor low.
I wouldn’t be so sure trug was involved. We’ve heard how brazenly treasonous Detline speaks, even in the presence of a member of the royal family (remember how Magdalena was ready to have her executed and could just barely contain herself after the meeting). So it wouldn’t be too surprising if some Sovereign knights (maybe of Dunkelfelger origin, since they tend to be rather emotional for nobles) couldn’t take the insults and saw red. Considering how Detlinde complained that also a member of the royal family, and not just knights, bared a weapon against her, I’m near enough sure that is what happened. Though after everything we’ve learned last volume, I wouldn’t be surprised if the knights that lost their temper had been under the after effects of trug, contributing to their short fuse.
Alternatively, through far less likely, it might all have been a setup to get rid of those two knights that died specifically. Either they were getting too close to the traitor, or they were associates of the traitor, that a loyalist wanted to get rid of.
Which brings me neatly to Raublut: I’m still very unsure about him. On one hand we have been given plenty of reason to be suspicious of him, but at the same time we have been given almost too much reason to be suspicious of him. In most other franchises I would say, he is so obviously set up as the villain, that it’s going to be a misdirect and he’ll turn out to be loyal after all… but then we do have Georgine, Detlinde, Veronica, Bezewanst and more, who proof that oftentimes the obvious is just that, obvious in this story.
I can still see routes of him being either loyal or a traitor. We know that there is a traitor either within, or very close to the royal family. That traitor might be Raublut himself. Maybe he was never loyal to Waldifried, but was placed in his service as a sleeper agent by the first prince and complicit in the second princes death. Or he could be a traitor, exactly because of his loyalty. He was devoting his live to Waldifried and when his master was killed by no one less than the prince’s own flesh-and-blood brother (well, half-brother anyway), Raublut became convinced that other than his dead master, the royal family is corrupt to the core and so he stated a long-term plan of wiping them all out… maybe with the exception of Hildebrand, who’s just too innocent to be considered corrupt.
Or on the loyalty side, he might be acting under his own initiative, without the permission or knowledge of the royal family, since he deduced that there is a traitor within the closest circles of the royal family, but he wasn’t able to identify them yet, so he feels like he can trust nobody and needs to be suspicious of everyone.
I’m really looking forward to see, where this is going. It’d be especially satisfying, if he was loyal and ended up working with Ferdinand and Rozemyne, to lay the actual traitor low.