• tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    1 year ago

    Rather disappointing.

    I’d be in favor of a law requiring the labeling of such products, but this seems to overreach; especially when applied to animal feed.

  • octoperson@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The proposal [prohibits] the use, sale, import and export of food and feed “from cell cultures or tissue derived from vertebrate animals”.

    Am I missing something, is it a translation issue, or did they just ban meat?

    • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what you could argue, yes.

      Since you can’t get any “tissue” without deriving it from an animal.

      Which would be the funnier solution… Well if you scientists and farmers can’t get along, nobody gets meat! Good news everyone! You’re all vegetarians now!

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s a translation issue. “Derivanti” in Italian is translated as “derived”, but the Italian word implies a new type of tissue (like “synthesized from”) and the English word does not.

  • rynzcycle@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Have they perfected lab-grown ketchup, because that burger looks dry AF.

    But seriously, just another boneheaded, corporate masquerading as populist move. This doesn’t protect consumers or farmers, it protects profits.

    • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That pic does look a little dry, but I’m very much looking forward to lab grown burgers. I hope and expect moves such as this are temporary, and as technology and understanding improve, we’ll get our cruelty-free and (presumably) lower environmental impact burgers. (And I’d expect texture, juicyness, etc to improve over time.)

      I am not a vegetarian but I enjoy many of the vegetarian choices for meat, from original gardenburgers through very nearly every other similar product I’ve tried. (I have not tried anything from Impossible except their sausage on a sandwich from dunkin donuts) But while they are nearly all very good for their own sake, none that I’ve run across have been true replacements for a burger.

      • rynzcycle@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, totally. Like any new product it will take some experimenting. I think I read it’s exceptionally lean, but tender, more like veal minus the cruelty. I get why they went burger, but almost certain to have better uses (STEAK!).

        Not a fan of most of the impossible stuff, still tastes too earthy, but I love seitan and good tofu used well.

        Temporary or not, these sort of bans will delay the growth (pun not intended, but I’ll take it) of these industries when time is of the essence. But Italy’s government is not exactly forward thinking at the moment.

        • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          iirc, it’s basically the most lean meat you can get because they haven’t done the whole growing fat thing yet, just the muscle.

        • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Temporary or not, these sort of bans will delay the growth (pun not intended, but I’ll take it) of these industries when time is of the essence.

          That is a great point!

      • rhizophonic@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’ve been evolving with the times for quite a while. Maybe change for the sake of change isn’t exactly the right thing either.

        Lab grown food, sold to you by the same system who sold you intensive farming.

        • wkk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          How is lab grown meat change for the sake of change? There’s obvious benefits to it: no more need to breed beings just to eat them, less resource-intensive, frees up land, and I might be missing others

          • rhizophonic@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Is it really sustainable ? I’m just not sure it’s a viable alternative to eating less meat and farming with sustainable and regenerative practices.