• ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    I imagine this is about financial chicanery or sex pesting but the funniest outcome would be if they just replaced him with ChatGPT to save money. If there’s any job a chatbot can do today, it’s CEO.

    • roguetrick@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      financial chicanery

      I’m sure he’s failing to find further funding in the current interest rate market and their business model frankly has no profitability end in sight. Running all those computing resources for free is a road to ruin.

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        9 months ago

        It actually seems to be the opposite - Altman focussing on commercialization, whereas the board wants to continue the non-commercial focus.

        I really hope this is the case.

        • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Oh wow, I assumed the main source of problems for this business was because creating models based on sampling the works of others was ethically dubious leading to lawsuits and bans in several countries. But no. It’s their CEO’s business model not aligning with the board.

        • Kata1yst@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hahahahahahahaha… A board more interested in non-profit work vs making more money? Sorry, I think this is way over optimistic.

          • giacomo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            9 months ago

            It’s a non-profit board; the members do not hold equity and the for-profit subsidiary has a profit allocation cap. It is not the same as a for-profit board.

        • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          That was my guess. I can imagine a situation where he was deliberately understating or obfuscating how vulnerable they were in that regard, or else simply overconfident they were legally in the clear.

  • delitomatoes@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    AI has been replacing the board members and now has control of the company

  • nicetriangle@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The reasons are probably fairly boring but it’d be kinda funny if they hit AGI and now everyone is in freakout mode behind the scenes.

  • Tygr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is a turning point that could be either really good or bad, depending on who you ask. Senior developers also left due to the news.

  • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Awful lot of comments here pretending he didn’t rape his sister. I wonder why.

    Edit: I love that the replies I’m getting literally prove my point. Real repulsive shit.

    • crystal@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Because its both irrelevant to the topic (unless that’s the reason he was fired, which I doubt) and a mere allegation. Innocent until proven guilty.

    • raptir@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      There was a series of three tweets and no follow-up. I wouldn’t necessarily assert it so strongly.