• Bagpuss999@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dunno man, that would also be an argument not to charge Chelsea and I’m sure we’re gonna get fucked

    • Lukeno94@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, it wouldn’t be. Because this is a singular instance of a relatively minor offence at this stage, for which the precedent is a fine at best. The comparisons people draw to Luton ignore that Luton had 15 charges, not 1. The allegations against Chelsea are much more serious and have a direct relationship to the transfer activity in the last couple of years.