• helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I see the disconnect now. You’re mistaking “open source” for 'inherently good."

    Uhhhh no you don’t see anything. I didn’t say anything like that.

    the forks either have to either maintain an increasingly complex list of patches to apply to fix what Google does to Chromium (the browser that runs two thirds of the web) or simply accept it.

    And they do the former.

    So I ask again, what’s the problem?

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I didn’t say anything like that.

      Yes, you did. In your first comment in this thread.

      what’s the problem?

      Your inability to grasp the problem after having it explain to you by multiple people, multiple times

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes, you did. In your first comment in this thread.

        If you’re just going to blatantly and plainly lie about what I said, where everyone can see it, I’m not going to continue engaging with you. Bye now 👋

        • LWD@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Here’s your first comment, where you imply Chromium is not bad for the web:

          I hear people say Chromium is bad for the web all the time but they all seem to think that Chromium = Chrome.

          I asked for clarification, and you confirmed my suspicion.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Which in no way resembles “open source is inherently good”, but thank you for reading my comments back to me.