Summary

  • Google’s proposal, Web Environment Integrity (WEI), aims to send tamper-proof information about a user’s operating system and software to websites.
  • The information sent would help reduce ad fraud and enhance security, but it also raises concerns about user autonomy and control over devices.
  • The authors argue that implementing WEI could lead to websites blocking access for users not on approved systems and browsers.
  • They express worries about companies gaining more control over users’ devices and the potential for abuse.
  • The authors emphasize that users should have the final say over what information their devices share.
  • Remote attestation tools, like WEI, might have their place in specific contexts but should not be implemented on the open web due to potential negative consequences.
  • The authors advocate for preserving user autonomy and the openness of the web, emphasizing that users should be the ultimate decision-makers about their devices.

Joke:

Two pieces of string walk into a bar. The first piece of string asks for a drink. The bartender says, “Get lost. We don’t serve pieces of string.”

The second string ties a knot in his middle and messes up his ends. Then he orders a drink.

The bartender says, “Hey, you aren’t a piece of string, are you?” The piece of string says, “Not me! I’m a frayed knot.”

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am not entirely sure about this.

    I was always someone who used “an alternative”. Back in the days I was an avid Netscape user, then I used the Mozilla suite, then Firefox when it still was named Phoenix, then Firefox actually named Firefox (😄) … but it went downhill. The fast and sleek browser got slower and more outdated over time.

    There were times when even Internet Explorer was more modern! Firefox had UI, core, and all tabs running in one single process, which meant, one website alone being able to not only crash the tab, but also all other tabs and the UI and the core - while IE started to implement having different processes for individual tabs.

    At one point I switched to Chromium and eventually to Vivaldi because Chromium - in comparison to Vivaldi - is basically unconfigurable. Vivaldi also has a very good mobile version and I have full synchronization between a minimum of 5 devices (yes, I mean it! I really depend on synchronization, I have my Arch PC, an Ubuntu Laptop, an Arch laptop, my Android phone, and a Windows laptop - all of them are regularly used). This is something I need and is a deal-breaker.

    Also extensions. There are two extensions I don’t want to leave behind. Both use MV3, one can be triggered for the current tab, one is automatically activated on one specific site.

    Maybe I should check out Firefox again, depending on what Vivaldi does regarding WEI.

    • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      Firefox now has Firefox Sync which allows seamless switching between devices and the performance of Firefox is generally on par with Chrome, sometimes faster. It also has a pretty dang big library of extensions.

    • whynotzoidberg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was there for the single process Firefox when everyone else went multiprocess. It was then that I also switched away from FF, too.

      I’m back on it now though (for past 9 months or so, since I heard about Google’s intention with Chrome.)

      Firefox and Safari are my daily drivers, and it’s pretty chill. Edge is my backup if I must.