The former president's lawyers argue why he cannot be barred from running for office for allegedly violating the 14th Amendment.
  • neclimdul@lemmy.world
    281·
    1 year ago

    Not sure how support doesn’t fall under “preserve, protect and defend” in every way that’s meaningful

    • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
      24·
      1 year ago

      That is the sophistry part. It clearly was intended to be a higher level of oath that included the lower one. Watch: SCOTUS will say that the president actually doesn’t have to support the Constitution.