• Echinoderm@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    That’s not comparing the same thing. Beating the crap out of someone is inherently illegal, free speech is not.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      True, but in this case his free speech is known to have inflamed his cult followers to commit acts of violence in his name, so it’s a closer comparison than it appears on the surface. Court personnel are already receiving death threats.

      • Echinoderm@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh, he absolutely should be told to shut his mouth.

        The point is the courts have to be a lot more careful about circumscribing a right that has quite strong existing protections versus something that does not.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Slander and libel are inherently illegal, being confidently wrong on the internet is not. Lucky you.