• ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I don’t see how that’s possible unless you have a huge family, you have some sort of chronic disease that insurance doesn’t cover, or you’re wildly irresponsible. Even in a high cost-of-living area, a normal family of four could live quite comfortably on that much money and still save some of it.

    (I don’t think that many high-earning people are wildly irresponsible. I suspect that this statistic isn’t right.)

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      When people hear “living paycheck to paycheck” they automatically assume it means barely making enough money for essentials. It for sure can mean that, but often people living paycheck to paycheck make good money, they just don’t live within their means. It’s not hard to buy a nicer house and a nicer car than your can really afford, and run up credit card debt, and find yourself in a situation where you can’t pay your bills because you’re overextended, even with a good salary.

    • stinky613@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      A few additional things to consider:

      • Accrued debt
      • Areas with highest cost of living tend to also be areas with relatively high population density (San Francisco is usually the go-to example for this)
      • Inflexibility of living in austerity
      • Intuit benefits from scaring people in the lower and middle economic classes