• tgcp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because, define lying.

    Even if you have proof the person was made aware of something, how can you prove they remembered it at the time?

    And what if they interpreted something incorrectly but believed they were telling the truth?

    And who gets to decide when someone is lying?

    • mackwinston@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The courts can already do this - perjury is already a criminal offence, and people have been charged and convicted of this. The court case when someone is accused of perjury will explore things like “And what if they interpreted something incorrectly but believed they were telling the truth”. The courts will decide if the evidence shows if someone is lying, just as they do with perjury.

      The courts already know the difference between saying something misleading because you were simply wrong (that’s not lying, that’s just being wrong), and saying something misleading with the intent to mislead (lying).