Author discovers AI-generated counterfeit books written in her name on Amazon::Amazon resisted a removal request, citing lack of “trademark registration numbers.”

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Upon searching Amazon and Goodreads, author Jane Friedman recently discovered a half-dozen listings of fraudulent books using her name, likely filled with either junk or AI-generated content.

    On Goodreads, the process requires authors to reach out to volunteer “librarians” and join specific groups and post in comment threads to request the removal of illegitimate books.

    Friedman reports that Goodreads removed the offending titles from her official author profile hours after her blog post went live.

    Although the fraudulent titles were eventually removed from Amazon after the story blew up, Friedman’s experience sheds light on the complex process authors must navigate to protect their name and work online.

    In a world where generative AI could potentially flood our communication channels with noise—low-quality, automated creative output in unlimited quantity—open selling platforms such as Amazon haven’t caught up with how to deal with the problem yet.

    On X, historian Dean Grodzins wrote, "I once bought what Amazon indicated was a paperback edition of George Saunders’s Swim in the Pond in the Rain.


    I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Friedman’s experience sheds light on the complex process authors must navigate to protect their name and work online.

      Or they can simply go to court without asking for complex processes

      • obscura_max@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah yes, going to court, a famously simple and cheap process for getting people to do what you want without torching a valuable business relationship.

        • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          famously simple and cheap process for getting people to do what you want

          simple and cheap: yes (if you live in a reasonable democracy)

          famous: idk

          for getting people to do what you want

          No. What the laws want.