Kaped@lemmy.ml to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agoSuperiority brings controversylemmy.mlimagemessage-square333fedilinkarrow-up11.74Karrow-down1108
arrow-up11.63Karrow-down1imageSuperiority brings controversylemmy.mlKaped@lemmy.ml to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agomessage-square333fedilink
minus-squareFreeman@lemmy.publinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down4·1 year agoIt’s a global setting, not per monitor or per setup and also quite gimped. Also on Wayland, on my couple of setups. It’s sucks ass.
minus-squareorangeboats@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoFractional scaling is per monitor on Wayland. (Unless it’s GNOME that you are using?)
minus-squareNemesis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoEven on Gnome it’s per monitor, but X.org apps remain blurry.
minus-squareorangeboats@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThen that means two major Wayland compositors (KDE and GNOME) support per monitor fractional scaling. Which makes me more confused about the “global setting” problem as mentioned by the previous commenter…
It’s a global setting, not per monitor or per setup and also quite gimped. Also on Wayland, on my couple of setups. It’s sucks ass.
Fractional scaling is per monitor on Wayland. (Unless it’s GNOME that you are using?)
Even on Gnome it’s per monitor, but X.org apps remain blurry.
Then that means two major Wayland compositors (KDE and GNOME) support per monitor fractional scaling.
Which makes me more confused about the “global setting” problem as mentioned by the previous commenter…