• Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    Infrastructure change at the scale you’re speaking about is not unheard of. The Netherlands did it twice. First because Europe got the shit bombed out of it and building car centric cities was trendy, then second because they realized what a shit idea that was and reversed it.

    Sure, the Netherlands was never sparse in the first place, but nobody’s asking for trains to farmer John’s house in Nebraska. If the Netherlands can rework their cities to at least chillax on cars, so can American cities.

    I know using the Netherlands as an example is trite, but urban planners literally know the solutions.

    • Z27F@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      First because Europe got the shit bombed out of it

      It has little to do with that, actually. There are very few cities that got heavily hit. What was removed and remodelled in the 60s and 70s was way more than the war had damaged and it happened after the major repairs were already done. Even cities and countries the war never really touched got extensive remodelling.

      It was a completely deliberate decision to remodel those cities, driven by modernist ideas.