• NielsBohron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Counterpoint: If you ask most elected officials edit: in the US (of either party), any two of those as policy goals would make you a socialist.

              • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                10 months ago

                i live in a colony of neoliberalism, im seeing things on a daily basis.

                some of which coming from a direct consequence of the empire’s decisions. some of which comes from genocides past.

                there was never a republic in the first place for us.

                  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    im not wondering if its important or not, i’m saying its not. what is your point?

                    you seem to get what the empire is capable of, but you dont get that they are actually doing this stuff already as much as they can, everywhere. we are “finding out” by virtue of US’s mere existence.

                    they will oppress us anyway so might as well think about freedom, and it doesnt matter whether or not the US would like socialism for itself or not, or how their deceiving politicians lie about it.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 months ago

        Socialism means one thing: democratic control over the economy. It’s radically left-wing in most of the world, and because of that socialists also advocate for other radically leftist ideas. I’m one of the radical leftists that don’t believe governments should exist at all in their current form, but that’s not what makes me a socialist.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Socialism being more international isn’t just because it’s radical, but because Communism can only exist fully if there is no Capitalism anywhere to re-emerge. What you’ve said is correct, just incomplete IMO.

        • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          isn’t government not existing just a form of libertarianism? (not trying to argue or anything; just genuinely curious)

          • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            before chuds hijacked it, libertarianism was always associated with the left. it was variously called anarchism and libertarian socialism.

          • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            before chuds hijacked it, libertarianism was always associated with the left. it was variously called anarchism and libertarian socialism.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Kind of. Communism itself is described as a Stateless, Classless, moneyless society, and Anarchism is Stateless as well. Socialism is just collective ownership of industry.