• h14h@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    434
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    11 months ago

    This kind of gatekeeping and elitism is bad for Lemmy and for FOSS.

    It makes this community a less welcoming place and leaves new folks with a bad first impression. Much better to be welcoming and let people learn/see the benefits of FOSS at their own pace.

  • OtakuAltair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    256
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Sync is just so much more polished and feature-rich than all of these already… It’s exactly like how it was when it was for reddit, and it’s just one dev! I don’t mind at all paying for a fantastic app.

    You guys are taking the justified corpo hate and extending it to talented individual devs just making a living.

    • voidMainVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      FOSS isn’t about “corpo hate”. It’s about freedom. There’s a philosophy behind it. You can, of course, disagree with it, but I think you should know what you’re disagreeing with.

      If the users don’t control the program, the program controls the users. With proprietary software, there is always some entity, the developer or “owner” of the program, that controls the program—and through it, exercises power over its users. A nonfree program is a yoke, an instrument of unjust power.

      • OtakuAltair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m talking about the community. A large part of the community absolutely is about gate-keeping and hating on corporations… and now devs too apparently.

        • baru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          A large part of the community absolutely is about gate-keeping and hating on corporations

          I haven’t seen that at all. Hate doesn’t bring you far.

          • thoro@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I have and it’s good and cool.

            Well maybe not gatekeeping. But hating corporations…

      • DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        In general I strongly prefer open source, because lots of propertiary software will try to vendor lock you and then extract money from you, when it’s hard to escape for you.

        In this case however I can change back to Connect or other any second, so amount of control this program has is extremely minimal and experience in exchange is better.

        Informed choice is better than picking and following dogma, because dogma doesn’t work in some cases.

        • kagemushablues@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah F locked ecosystems. Anyone can walk away from Sync if they don’t like it.

          The philosophy of FOSS is very cool but for one dev Sync is way too much work to be doing for free. It has my support.

      • TwentySeven@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s about a very narrowly and specifically defined version of freedom, which somewhat ironically restricts people’s ability to define freedom for themselves.

        I personally find Apache2, MIT, or the WTFPL a lot more free-feeling than all the restrictions GPL imposes in the name of freedom.

        • jamesravey@lemmy.nopro.be
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I used to agree until I saw corporations starting to fork open source projects to run them internally like the “I made this” meme.

          If I spend months or years of my life toiling over a project and license it permissively with MIT or such, they can just swoop in one day and take it for free and be like “thanks, we’re going to make mega bucks off your code and give you nothing” (and yes this does happen https://www.elastic.co/blog/why-license-change-aws).

          No, screw that! I’m gonna make my stuff AGPL and those guys can damn well pay me for my time of they want to use my stuff or more cynically, do it anyway or go and reimplement it themselves in-house knowing damn well I can’t afford an army of lawyers to actually do anything about it.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Your freedom to swing your arm ends at my nose. Your freedom to do whatever you want with my code ends when you want to bind other users with it.

        • snor10@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yes, the “free” in free software specifically refers to the freedom to read and modify the source code.

          That’s the specific freedom we are talking about when we say “free as in freedom”.

          Also, under the philosophy, permissive licenses (like MIT or BSD) is still considered free since you can see and modify the source code. The only thing the GPL strive to ensure is that this freedom will be awarded all others who interact with the fruits of your labour.

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, until he gets an attractive buyout offer from an SEO company who wants to get into data mining.

      • OtakuAltair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Hating on someone based on unfounded hypotheticals is fucked up. LJ has always been very open with the community for the whole time Sync was on reddit.

        Username checks out ig?

        • jerkface@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Wow, that is “hating” in your world? I wish I lived there. Take it down a notch, dude.

          Yes, I am talking about potentials; potentials that simply do not exist in the FOSS world but happen every day with commercial software. A significant difference between an independent dev and a libre project is that you own the libre project. No one can ever take it away from you. You merely borrow it from the independent dev, and in that way, and speaking as a frustrated developer myself, every single one of them suck in all the same ways that every single corporation sucks. There’s no difference. That’s not hate, that’s pragmatic realism.

          • naitro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            So what exactly is the problem here? If Sync gets bought and you don’t like the new owner, you can stop using it and move on…

      • jonsnothere@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean, just change apps at that point? There’s no lock-in, worst case you lose what you paid to remove ads. No point getting worked up over hypothetical scenarios

      • OldSchoolMonkey@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean he had all the opportunity for selling Sync for reddit and take profit. I converted to Sync nearly 7 years ago when I bought their ad free version called Sync Pro. He made great improvements adding material ui and lots of desirable features for an already great app. From my POV he didn’t abandon the app, gave updates till the last day of its existence and was a great dev in general who was active in his sub listening to our queries . Maybe the people who knew him from those days are the ones who is supporting him now.

  • jerieljan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    201
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t get the point of this.

    Since when did Sync masquerade itself as FOSS?

    Just use whatever you want. Isn’t that why we’re all here?

    Is the Sync noise getting to you? Just ignore it. It’s natural since the app just opened up and there were a significant amount of Reddit refugees that badly wanted their app back.

  • SaddieTheMad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    183
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    I am disliking this sentiment. I am on the Fediverse because Sync’s developer and many others were betrayed by Reddit and I wanted to show solidarity and to ‘punish’ Reddit by leaving. The Fediverse’s values are admirable, but I do not share them all. I believe in supporting good projects, even some that are private if they don’t pose a risk of destroying something bigger, and Sync is a good project that can be easily abandoned without consequences if something goes wrong.

  • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Paid software absolutely has a place in the world. Evil companies producing evil software designed to build a monopoly and lock out FOSS apps do not. I don’t think Sync falls into the latter and I’m happy they’ve made the choice to be able to eat.

    • onescomplement@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Just commenting this for those that may think free software is referring to price.

      Free software is diametrically opposed to proprietary software, and not paid software.

      Free software is free in terms of libre, not necessarily gratis. And there are corporations and individual contributors to free software that do charge for their product and maintenance of it.

  • spirinolas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    If apps were girls:

    I was always in love with Sync. But life happened and we had to go different ways for non-romantic reasons. Some fucker called Spez, long story…

    Eventually I met Voyager and she was great. Any user would be lucky to have her. But Sync was always the one that got away. Everyday I looked at Voyager and thought she was awesome but I was always holding a candle for Sync. But Sync was gone and I had to move on. But I could never really move on.

    But life happened again and Sync was coming back. I had committed to Voyager but, as great as she was, I always thought how she came short of Sync. Sync came back and she was as stunning as I remembered. I couldn’t stay with Voyager. I’m sorry Voyager. You’re an awesome girl but I was pretty much just using you since I couldn’t have Sync.

    I’m a user Voyager, I make no excuses. There, there…

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    136
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    I say this as someone that uses FOSS day to day for work, I don’t really give a shit if my Lemmy app is FOSS.

    For me, Sync was Reddit. It’s where 99% of my interaction with Reddit happened. I don’t really give a shit about Lemmy or the fediverse either. I’m here because Sync is a seamless product that gave me the best interface.

    Despite saying that I don’t care about Lemmy or other distributed servers, Sync is basically that sync (lol) for me. Once I map my old subreddits on Lemmy, the experience doesn’t change.

  • MKBandit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    120
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Sync is by far the most polished. Everyone acting this is some major company. It’s literally one dude.

  • FireworkFuse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    Oh nooooooo someone made a familiar and easy to use app to help people get used to this new ecosystem that can only thrive if people actually show up and use it. What a real shame.

    Are we really being this petty already?

  • KuroJ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I honestly don’t see what the problem is. If you prefer FOSS use FOSS apps.

    I’ve tried every single Lemmy app for iOS and Android, but I can honestly say nothing comes close to how smooth and native Sync feels.

    I wasn’t even a Sync user on Reddit so I didn’t understand the hype, but I get it now. On my Pixel 6 Pro all of the other Lemmy apps had some kind of issues, whether that be random crashes or frame rate issues. But Sync is just so smooth and feature rich.

    I’ve also joined the sync discord and the developer is very clear on what type of data he collects (He doesn’t, but Google may).

    Also with the pricing, if you don’t agree with the price that’s your opinion, but the amount of complaining is ridiculous. He made the app so whatever he wants to charge is his decision. You can also still freely use the app (with ads) so no one is forcing you to buy.

  • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    I like all the FOSS and community development of different Lemmy clients that’s going on, it’s really awesome and great to see.

    But if Apollo was released for Lemmy, I’d subscribe to Ultra (or buy lifetime) in a heartbeat and only look at alternatives out of interest, not because I’d want to use them as my main Lemmy client. Apollo was just that good.

    Views like this one feel pretty toxic and elitist to me. Let people use Sync if they like it. Let people use their Android phone unrooted if they are fine with it. Heck, let people use Windows if they like it.

  • Reamen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    To be fair, this should be the other way around. All these foss apps are the teletubbies because they’re clunky and have major bugs. Sync is the power ranger.

    • OtakuAltair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yeah I’ve used all the apps in this post and Sync is just light years ahead of all of them right now. Well worth the 19$ to remove the ads

      Kinda shitty to hate on Sync like this for not being foss when the dev never claimed it to be.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Well worth the 19$ to remove the ads

        Sync has gone to subscription payments:

        • bonfire921@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          64
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Might be a hot take but it’s also justified to try and make money from software development that is not prefatory

            • pivot_root@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              It’s not illegal, but it’s not profitable.

              Companies aren’t making squat from happy fans donating a token amount to show support of the software. Everything adjacent to the open source software is profitable (enterprise sales, support contracts, hardware, corporate sponsors/funding, and so forth), but you’re going to have a really hard time selling something to consumers when they can just as easily get it for free.

        • traches@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Sync isn’t some international conglomerate harvesting your data, it’s one dude’s passion project. Guy’s gotta eat and monetizing FOSS is real hard.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      You’re still stuck in 2002 or something? Most of the web is literally FOSS. Gone are the myths of free software being worse when the whole world literally runs on it.

      • Madlaine@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        (not op)

        Sure, but in this case, most of the lemmy-clients (FOSS or not) are bad.

        I have problems logging into my accounts (seems like some instances want my email as a username and many clients cannot handle this after I switched accounts), some clients don’t feature editing or deleting your posts, some clients don’t show my saved content, some clients don’t allow to see what you posted

        Sure, much of this is because they started from scratch and will maybe surpass sync some day; but right now I couldn’t find something that isn’t worth. (didn’t try infinity yet, tho)

        it’s not necessarily “FOSS is bad”; it’s just that the current lemmy-ecosystem is in it’s child shoes (I have the feeling this proverb doesn’t work in english?)

        That said: I use Sync4Lemmy since 5 minutes and this is my first comment; so let’s see if/what it will deliver

        • ADTJ@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          Never heard that idiom before, (is it German?) Sentiment is clear though, I would probably just say “in its infancy” or something.

          Also completely agree with your points. I’m a major supporter of FOSS but at the end of the day, I’m gonna use what actually works - the same as everyone else.

        • MartinXYZ@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          it’s just that the current lemmy-ecosystem is in it’s child shoes (I have the feeling this proverb doesn’t work in english?)

          The meaning is perfectly clear. I believe English speakers would say “…is in its infancy” but that’s just a common way of saying “early stages” not a proverb per se.

      • kono_throwaway_da@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        He’s not saying all FOSS software is bad, only the FOSS Lemmy clients are.

        Personally, I found Jerboa to be okay. But Sync definitely feels more polished here, it’s not a question of FOSS and not-FOSS. I still have Jerboa installed though, just to see how it evolves, and I might switch back to it in the future.

      • godless@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        Most FOSS apps are equal to or better than proprietary software when it comes to functionality, but look like they were coded in the stone age.

        Most casual users value GUI over everything. And while I personally can overlook shitty user interfaces on apps I use once in a blue moon, for a social media app I’m using daily, that’s a no go.

        • 1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah a lot of open source apps looks ugly but are just better. I have no idea why design is not a priority. Just look at the most popular products anywhere. They all look good.

          • LeFantome@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            UX people cannot make their own apps without hiring devs ( requiring money ).

            Devs can create Open Source apps but they cannot afford to hire UX guys so the UX sucks.

            Larger projects can attract both devs and UX guys but getting to popularity is hard and, even then, coordinating these diverse teams ( eg. dev and UX ) take project management skill and effort. That is yet another skill set that has to volunteer to be paid.

            For a proprietary app, you simply hire the people you need. When you start, you need UX either to attract uses or money. So, UX is one of you first roles you spring for if you are proprietary ( depending on the market ).

      • chocobo13z@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Counterpoint: most Javascript on the web is obfuscated to all hell. While technically you can see the code that’s running, it being obfuscated is definitely not in the spirit of FOSS, and largely the open source components of servers are being used to prop up all the closed-source stuff reaching end users.

        • jamesravey@lemmy.nopro.be
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          Counter counterpoint: Often frontend js code is minified so that it is smaller and more efficient to transfer to the browser. For FOSS projects you should still be able to get access to that code, unminified, from the project git repo. In the same way desktop apps often ship as binary executables but you can still see the code that was compiled to build them if you find the source repo.

          It does make things harder to debug for an average user but it makes it faster/more efficient to run for most end users (in the case of the desktop or phone app it makes it possible to run without needing compiler toolchains that mom and pop likely wouldn’t be able to grasp).

          The key thing isn’t that what the end user’s computer runs is readable and editable but whether the code used to build that artifact is available easily and what restrictions there are on editing and redistributing that code.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s not about Javascript. All of the frameworks and front end tools are open source. React, nextjs, tailwind etc. - all are foss projects and run the best UX and UI we know of.

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            I don’t really want to be that guy, but at least in the case of React and NextJS, the companies have a business reason for them being open source.

            Meta uses React internally in a lot of projects. Every other company or developer making contributions in their spare time is free labor, and it directly improves Meta’s own products.

            Vercel has a vested interest in having developers adopt NextJS, as they sell web hosting. It’s easier to build a community of developers around an open-source product, and they even help out with contributions, documentation writing, and QA.

            • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Tbh I’m not exactly sure how is that relevant? Be it Jesus guiding me to make TempleOS or incentive to sell some service the outcome is the same foss

          • chocobo13z@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            My point is more that all these open source tools have been used by many, many, many sites to build a series of black boxes on top, for which there is no source available. I suppose one easy example is the existence of EME in open source browsers, the existence of which being the reason I actually don’t run a pre-compiled binary of Firefox, instead building it myself, with EME not built in.

      • Samsy@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        On security concerns FOSS should be the better solution. Its code is readable and auditable by everyone. Closed Source need trust/faith in a company or in just one single person.

    • Alfi@lemmy.alfi.casa
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      To be fair they probably had most of the code ready, and just had to port it to Lemmy.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Major bugs? That’s not true at all, unless you mean “no tracking” is a bug?

  • fidodo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m anti mega corporations with consolidated power and platform monopolies. I’m not anti small distributed devs getting paid for high quality hard work.

  • cdegallo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    I couldn’t care less if foss app users or developers are butthurt because closed apps are suddenly available and gaining popularity.

    Sync for lemmy landed and it has been more stable and has more features than any of the other lemmy apps I’ve tried.

    Maybe if the foss apps were stable and feature rich more casual plebs like me would use them, but at the moment they all feel kind of broken.

    Also, I would take issue with jerboa here. Jerboa is there but not Connect? Lol…