In a pivotal moment for the autonomous transportation industry, California chose to expand one of the biggest test cases for the technology.

  • mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The world isn’t going to switch to mass transit and ditch cars, so if we’re stuck with them they should at least be cheaper and safer.

    • heartfelthumburger@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well where I live more and more people are choosing to not have cars because public transit covers their needs for transportation. People still get a drivers license, but don’t own a car. Car renting is big with a lot of streets having dedicated parking spots for them.

      • mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If those rental cars are going to be around, and if people want taxi apps because they don’t own a car then there’s two applications for self-driving tech.

        Public transit is great, but it works best for dense areas along busy routes, and there’s always people who want to go direct without transferring, or walking to a station. Suburbs and rural areas won’t be relying on public transit, the activity is too low.

        Self-driving cars lead to fewer deaths than human drivers, they will eventually be cheaper to insure than human drivers, and summoning a taxi without a person will be cheaper than one with one.