In this video, a Canon print cartridge is opened up and revealed not to contain the meagre 11.9 ml (0.4 fl oz) of ink it is advertised. The proposed solution is to buy a printer designed to be manually refilled with bottles of ink (such as the featured Epson EcoTank ET-2850), though it has only been tested briefly.

  • ByteWelder@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The cost effectiveness difference on the bottles versus sponges is probably much bigger than the video suggests, because a whole bunch of ink is likely sticking to the sponge and never coming out.

    • The downside of sponges is that scammy printer ink companies abuse them to mislead customers. The upside is that they prevent problems that storing a liquid and possibly moving it back and forth in a jerking motion, as inkjet printers often do.

      A good printer company, if such a thing exists, could make much more reliable printers with sponges then with tanks. Sadly, like their products, all printer companies are evil.

      • CurrMudgeon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve always ordered ink from inkjets.com because it’s cheap and their cartridges are completely clear so you can actually see that they’re full of ink like you’d expect.