OttoVonNoob@lemmy.caM to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 7 months agoPractical designs like this are hard to find..lemmy.caimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imagePractical designs like this are hard to find..lemmy.caOttoVonNoob@lemmy.caM to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squareDagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months ago Northrop Tacit Blue. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Tacit_Blue TIL
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoI can’t look at without giggling. Aww, it’s so stupid! Like they fumbled some CAD layers and flew the bounding box.
minus-squareDagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoIf it looks stupid but it works, it isn’t stupid.
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoSure, assuming once is enough.
minus-squareJustUseMint@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoIf you’re interested in more, Lazerpig recent “stealth” video discuses this very aircraft and how it competed with the F-117
minus-squareDagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoThanks. I am more into prop planes, but knowledge is always good to have.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Tacit_Blue
TIL
I can’t look at without giggling. Aww, it’s so stupid! Like they fumbled some CAD layers and flew the bounding box.
If it looks stupid but it works, it isn’t stupid.
Sure, assuming once is enough.
If you’re interested in more, Lazerpig recent “stealth” video discuses this very aircraft and how it competed with the F-117
Thanks. I am more into prop planes, but knowledge is always good to have.