• laverabe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        In November 2017, Brazile said in her book and related interviews that the Clinton campaign and the DNC had colluded ‘unethically’ by giving the Clinton campaign control over the DNC’s personnel and press releases before the primary in return for funding to eliminate the DNC’s remaining debt from 2012 campaign,

        https://wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries#July_2016:_National_Convention_and_email_leaks

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          We need a national movement to take the primaries out of the hands of the parties and run them like regular elections. Even better would be rank choice voting so we are no longer stuck with the two choices the wealthy give us.

            • Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              Tried and failed, over and over and over and over again, but sure, I’m sure it will end differently this time.

              If we could get enough voter cooperation to replace one of the major parties, any strategy would work. If we can’t then going third party is the worst possibile strategy.

                • Tinidril@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Oh, definitely. I’m not critiquing “optimism”, just a particular strategy. There is no advantage that exists in a third party strategy that doesn’t exist in a intra-party strategy, but there are a lot of disadvantages. Until we get rid of first-past-the-post elections, third parties can’t overcome the spoiler effect.