• Creesch@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The fact that you specifically respond to this one highly specific thing. While I clearly have written more is exactly what I mean.

    shrugs

    • acastcandream@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Would you like me to quote every single one of your lines, line by line, and respond to them? Is that the kind of conversation you want to have? Or can you use common sense and infer that I am reading everything and responding to the things I think are worth responding to, which is pretty standard behavior in human conversations?

      I am taking issue with elements of your comments. You are wholesale claiming I - and others - said things I/they did not, and then ignoring when I ask you to stop doing it or show me where I said whatever you accused me of.

      When did anyone say

      But by just shouting, “AI is at it again with its antics!” at every turn instead of looking further and at other core issues we will only make things worse”

      Or

      that doesn’t mean all bullshit out there is caused by AI

      Who said those lines? Where are they? I’m not hiding behind “I didn’t personally say it.” I understand basic Internet thread etiquette. If you are reaffirming somebody else’s comment, you are generally standing behind most if not all of what they said. But nobody here is saying or doing the things you are claiming. You are tilting at windmills.

      You can infer that either I consider the thing I did not specifically mention not worth mentioning, or I agree enough to not warrant debating it. This is like basic social etiquette dude. I am pointing out the specific elements I find objectionable and want to discuss. How meta do I need to get here?