Reddit said in a filing to the Securities and Exchange Commission that its users’ posts are “a valuable source of conversation data and knowledge” that has been and will continue to be an important mechanism for training AI and large language models. The filing also states that the company believes “we are in the early stages of monetizing our user base,” and proceeds to say that it will continue to sell users’ content to companies that want to train LLMs and that it will also begin “increased use of artificial intelligence in our advertising solutions.”

The long-awaited S-1 filing reveals much of what Reddit users knew and feared: That many of the changes the company has made over the last year in the leadup to an IPO are focused on exerting control over the site, sanitizing parts of the platform, and monetizing user data.

Posting here because of the privacy implications of all this, but I wonder if at some point there should be an “Enshittification” community :-)

  • The Bard in Green@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    When I go to some reddit posts on Mobile now (like from a Google search, that’s the only way I end up at reddit anymore), it tells me “this content is unmoderated” and gives me a choice to either navigate away or install the Reddit app. Fuck that noise.

    • alekradic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Try this, in either Bing/Copilot AI or Google Gemini: Start your prompt with “According to Reddit”, then do your search like you would by using search alone.

      The AI of your choice will scrape the posts and give you a nice summary of whatever you were searching for - no need to ever touch Reddit directly.

      For me, this works better with Copilot, YMMV.

      Example: “According to Reddit, what is the best mechanical keyboard brand to use for touch typing?”

  • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    “we are in the early stages of monetizing our user base,”

    If anyone on Reddit reads that and stays there willingly they are an idiot. Not they weren’t idiots for staying after the API changes but now they are even bigger idiots.

  • Aolley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    They’ve finally gone full /HailCorporate, become the thing some of the original people of the site would probably not have agreed with in many ways

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    “Early Stages?” You’ve got AI mining your data. The Lions have already come and gone. The hyenas and other scavengers are picking over the scraps, now.

      • Aolley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        They have probably only provided a small amount of available data, and have much more data, of different type.

        Yes we’ve got the data, but now we need it from different angles!

  • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Reddit has long had an issue with confidently providing false statements as fact. Sometimes I would come along a question that I was well educated on, and the top voted responses were all very clearly wrong, but sounded correct to someone who didn’t know better. This made me question all the other posts that I had believed without knowing enough to tell otherwise.

    Llms also have the same issue of confidently telling lies that sound true. Training on Reddit will only make this worse.

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      @Fubarberry yes I saw this a lot too. Highly upvoted confidently incorrect comments, with the real answer or an answer debunking them with links to factual sources less upvoted.

      Happened to me as well.

      • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I am a lawyer and I would get down voted for posts explaining the law that contained citations to the actual applicable statute if people didn’t like the statute. Using reddit up votes as a measure of correctness is fundamentally a dumb idea.

    • federico3@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I would come along a question that I was well educated on, and the top voted responses were all very clearly wrong, but sounded correct to someone who didn’t know better.

      This can be said to https://news.ycombinator.com/ as well. I wonder how much of this is due to sock puppets and bots.

      • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s a really good article, and it does a good job of highlighting the issues with modern day search results.

        I’ve been guilty to use “best x” pages before, but if the website with the “best of page” doesn’t have specific reviews linked I usually look up individual product reviews for the good sounding items on other websites.

      • Swallowtail@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        This is a great example of why it’s so important to emphasize teaching critical thinking in school right now. Misinformation and disinformation is just going to continue to grow.

        • blindsight@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Literally why I bookmarked it. I’m an online teacher, so I’m going to advocate for adding that article to a grade 10 course that’s used by thousands of students each year.

          • Swallowtail@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m a student teacher right now in elementary! I try to get my kids to think critically whenever I can. I hear kids talk about insane shit they saw/heard on tiktok (I got into an argument with a student who thought Slenderman was 100% real because of something they saw on tiktok) and I try to really get them to think and actually justify why they believe things.

            • blindsight@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Somewhat related:

              A recommendation about teaching controversial topics: you need to build connection first.

              I mean, that’s true of all teaching, but when you start to question the (prejudiced) things they’re hearing from trusted adults at home, you really need to have a strong relationship with the students.

              Being an anti-racist pro-SOGI educator in conservative communities is hard.

              I wish you success in your career! Teachers have such an opportunity to make a huge impact on the world.

      • Krudler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I spent 20 years as a producer, developer, and project manager in the lottery and games industry.

        Trying to explain how lottery and games work to people and have them hear me makes me want to cry.

        • Chiro@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Fascinating! I’d love to hear a little about it, if you don’t mind.

          • Krudler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Certainly, I’m always happy to share with inquisitive minds.

            Is there any particular question you’d like me to address?

            • Chiro@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Not really, I never paid much mind to it. I’m curious about the whole industry I guess, or anything you’d like to share or set the record straight about.

              • Krudler@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Oh there’s lots I have to set the record straight about and there’s lots I could talk about, but without being asked a specific question that would just leave me to write an open-ended essay and I’m not up for it right now

      • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Downvoting was always just fast food validation that you’re better than someone else without having to actually back it up.

      • execia@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Wow. You’re extremely on point. No logical counterarguments but rather several downvotes for a field I’m very familiar with. Downvotes determine the validity of a comment, not their content.

      • const_void@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The voting system let’s people push comments to the top that they want to be true, not necessarily things that are true.

        • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          There’s also the issue of reddit comment sorting being entirely dominated by time. In something like 90% of posts, the top comment is one of the first five. Literally all you have to do is just comment first, and it’ll likely be the top.

          • federico3@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            This tends to give more influence to people who spend more time on it and write more. And they are less likely to be subject matter experts.

            • Uglyhead@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Some of the better subreddits tried to mix it up and change how this affected upvotes. There was Muxing,…etc etc… But then,… Spez came in (back) and didn’t give af about anything at all except money.

              • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                First time I’m hearing about this, can you give any links? Maybe we could use something similar in lemmy

                • Uglyhead@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Muxing upvotes , “balances”, etc.

                  Even hiding all upvotes of every comment thread until ~12 hrs after posting.

          • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I noticed from the beginning that Lemmy’s default comment sorting improves visibility of a variety of comments including newer ones. Gee, I wonder who could have helped make it that way ;)

            Over the years I ended up getting a Reddit habit of replying to one of the top comments so that it could attain some visibility. I still do sometimes but less often on Lemmy.

        • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I strongly agree with this comment. To show my appreciation, you have my upvote. Had I only agreed a little bit, I might have not voted at all. If that comment had made me angry, I might have downvoted.

          Actually calling these things votes instead of likes makes a lot of sense. I might not like a comment, but I might want it to be higher. I might not hate another comment, but I might want it to be lower because of other reasons.

    • Aolley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      but sounded correct to someone who didn’t know better

      specious /spē′shəs/ adjective

      Having the ring of truth or plausibility but actually fallacious.
      "a specious argument."
      

      and then the real answer will be hidden or something silly, or in some cases where money is involved the correct answer might have been removed

  • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Looks like the enshitification of Reddit is about to accelerate. I barely use it anymore, but I kept my two ten year + old accounts intact (one for porn one for legit posts). I’ll probably nuke my non-porn account soon.

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    You know the phrase “If you aren’t paying, you’re the product”.
    It doesn’t hit as hard as a CEO using the phrase “Monetizing Our User Base”.

  • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I wonder if they would use the data on all my old accounts that got banned for promoting violence against the billionaire class.

    Don’t forget kids – all rights are won through violence.

  • Uglyhead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    “Pay-Per-Click”, is all this is when you break it down to its basest.

    Narwhal developers have come out and said that they have to pay beforehand for clicks to the API—- what absolute bullshit Reddit and Spez are bringing to the trough. Spez killed reddit—- calling it now; a slow painful lingering shitty death.

    People will not put up with it once they know what is really going on.

    Let em know. “Pay-Per-Click” will not stand.

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Makes me wonder how that technology is going to track. Reddit isn’t bad for finding niche answers to niche questions, but if you import the data wholesale then you’ll have a hard time separating the signal from the noise, even if you sort by using vote counts as relevance.

        Reddit is valuable because people can do a search for a niche topic and find the answer on that forum. And the answer was written by a human. It’s not valuable because it can amalgamate an approximation of those answers that might be 90% true and 10% dead wrong.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          As someone with expertise in some niche fields:

          They’re almost always wrong about everything, and when someone tries to correct them, with sources, they get downvoted.

      • Coreidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        This is a human thing and not so much a reddit thing. People been arguing on the internet since the inception of message boards.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I disagree. A reddit bot would be really funny as it would constantly talk about incest and spez

    • veee@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Given that Spez managed to write himself a $193M cheque, I’d say it’s idiots all the way down.

  • Daniyyel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Is this a long term source of revenue for Reddit? Or will it loose value at some point, simply because LLMs are all trained sufficiently on user generated content. Is there more to learn at some point?

    Also it seems that a lot of content on Resdit is already AI generated, so it would train on data from other LLMs, which I’m sure doesn’t improve quality.

    • Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s the reason I can’t see this stock maintaining or improving its price after the IPO. I mean, sure, there will probably be a short term gain for a few stock holders. But, I just don’t see how it doesn’t tank afterwards. I mean, in the end, Reddit is Reddit. It’s just an aggregation site, how can it grow in value? The fediverse is slowly but surely gaining popularity. And even though Reddit calls itself the front page of the internet, it really isn’t.

      *Not investment advice. Good god please don’t take investment advice from me. Knowing my luck that fucking stock will soar to Wall Street record highs, beating out Bitcoin by a large margin.

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s just an aggregation site, how can it grow in value?

        Supposedly in Reddit finance there’s something called the “Anarchy Chess/Ewan gambit”. If you post one grain of rice, and double it each time you reach a threshold you can farm near-infinite updoots! Probably works the same with money, idk.

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      LLM’s are a parasitic entity. They can only operate as long as they have a living host (us) on which to draw data. Without their host, they rapidly start hallucinating. Hell, the other day ChatGPT (and every business that relied on it) started hallucinating for no apparent reason.

      The thing about the parasite is, though, that it endangers its host. At some point, the fact that anything you say can be plugged into a machine with no credit given back to you, will encourage creative people to stop bothering being creative, depriving them of income or even exposure.

      It’s a funny thing, a few years ago I would say that the “anything you post here can be sold by us” clause on social media was very unlikely to get exploited, as nobody knew how to sell data en masse to make money off of it. I guess now we know that’s not true at all. If something bad can happen with your data… It will.

    • delirious_owl@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well, eventually LLMs will need to be fed new misinformation at some point, such as which minority was responsible for their own genocide