The contents of the Israeli Association of Rape Crisis Center’s paper alleging “systematic” Hamas rape derive largely from discredited second-hand testimonies and debunked media reports. Among its most heavily cited sources is a dubious NY Times article that triggered a staff revolt at the paper.
Wikipedia too, I suppose.
This sub’s credibility seems to be on par with the Gray Zone based on what you’re upvoting - I’m blocking this brain rot.
Ah - lemmy.ml - it all fails into place - red fascist nonsense.
Grayzone is a Russian propaganda troll pretending to be left wing in order to pull people to their side.
You people are one step away from creating a conservapedia equivalent because “wikipedia has a liberal bias”
Removed by mod
Why do you have “Stormfront” under the parody Wikipedia globe?
(Literally just asking for clarification. It’s not obvious to me and I’d like to understand your intent.)
It the implication that Wikipedia is as bad as the infamous neo-nazi website Stormfront?
Not sure: I didn’t make the emoji, I only borrowed it. There is a relationship between NATO and fascism, though.
The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It
Even outside of political reasons Wikipedia is dog shit, how many more cases of teenagers editing and keeping completely wrong shit should be publicized before you fucking shitlibs stop using it as a source? Or this recent news about a bored housewife trolling the Turks