• xkforce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Jerry antagonized Tom into attacking him more often than not. He viewed it as a game rather than a life or death struggle. Tom OTOH would be kicked out on the street if he didn’t try to keep Jerry under control.

  • tjhart85@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Interview With the Vampire … kind of … Lestat was by no means good to Louis, but their portrayals in the rest of the series was quite different … I think that Anne Rice was trying to show that neither of them should be considered reliable narrators and Louis will always try to portray his situation as awfully as possible and Lestat is a narcissist and will always try to portray himself in the best light even when acknowledging what he did incorrectly.

    But, when I saw that book 2 was about Lestat, I was like … wtf … I hate this guy, why would I want a story with him as the main character and then I read them all, lol.

  • Chahk@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Gru in Despicable Me.

    Zangief in Wreck-it Ralph: “You are bad guy but this does not mean you are bad guy. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯”

      • simple@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The villains aren’t good though, it just turned out that the princess has some honor in the war

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          The villains had the goal of driving back the fungal forest, which was advancing and destroying civilization. They didn’t know that it was filtering pollutants out of water, and they were using militaristic techniques that have the designated “evil” tag but that IMO should be considered in a more nuanced way.

          Basically, Nausicaa thought she was in the post-apocalypse and wanted to “live in harmony” with the state of the world. The Valley of the Wind had unique advantages allowing them to do that. Kushana thought the apocalypse was still ongoing, and it was - we saw that other settlements that didn’t have the special meteorological layout of the Valley of the Wind were being overrun by advancing fungal forests.

          From a very slightly different perspective, Kushana was the hero here. She was unifying a disorganized and doomed rabble of survivors to work against their doom, and recovered an ancient superweapon to turn it into a protective force that would save humanity instead of attacking it. She turned out to be wrong about a few things but being wrong doesn’t make you evil. I’d argue that she wasn’t really wrong about some of the important stuff and the movie ends on a mixed note.

          It’s been a little while since I’ve seen the movie, mind you, but it stuck with me pretty strongly.

  • Kornblumenratte@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not exactly a story. I just watched Babylon 5, and it’s fascinating how the good guys are the bad guys are the good guys are the bad guys…

    • Terrasque@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Who are you?

      What do you want?

      Also, I think good and bad is a bit fluid there. It’s just people with different agendas. Well, except emperor Cartagia. And perhaps Bester.

      • Kornblumenratte@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        No bad guys are good guys. And most good guys are not good guys, either.

        The Shadows, the Centauri and the PSI Corps are introduced as “bad guys” but gain a lot of positive aspects during the show without becoming “good guys”. The Nightwatch and the Earth Governement under president Clark are “bad guys” – but quite a few of there supporters/members become important “good” characters, like Zach Allan, Elizabeth Lochley or Susanna Luchenko.

        That’s my point about the Babylon 5 series – they deconstruct the good guy/bad guy meme. Mostly.

      • VintageTech@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Reviewing his career and accomplishments - the guy was a real life Michael Douglas in Falling Down… but followed through on a larger scale. And deaths, a whole lot more deaths.

  • Talaraine@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The Watchmen. Everyone thought Ozymandias was the supreme evil but what he did ultimately saved billions of lives.

      • Maeve@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The trolly problem. I guess saving billions is better than a million, unless you and loved ones are in the million.

        • Bonehead@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          You assume the trolley existed to begin with. There’s no guarantee that Ozymandias’ predictions were right. We’ve been there before, in real life, and turned it back. Nothing says that wouldn’t have happened in their world as well. That’s why he’s not actually a good guy…he took away the option to choose, and killed millions in the process.

    • daddyjones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Snape was never a good guy though. Very brave, yes and he had some good qualities. He was also vindictive and a bully - willing to put his petty dislikes above the quality of his teaching.

      • turkishdelight@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        He was also vindictive and a bully

        I formed the impression that James Potter and his gang were the real bullies, and Snape is a tragic character traumatized by their bullying.

      • illi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Snape was a good guy, in a sense of oposing the bad guy.

        He was however not a good guy in a sense of being at least a decent human being.