• fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Australia checking in.

    For the last 2 years we’re suddenly awash with these cheap Chinese cars, and yank tanks.

    They’re both ridiculous in their own way. I can’t see myself buying either in the next decade.

    The Chinese stuff is only selling because its cheaper, but it’s going to cost a lot more to own because it’s going to lose value much more quickly than real cars. As usual, you pay more for cheaper products.

    That said, I don’t mind them being here and putting some downward pressure on the price of proper cars.

    Commence downvotes butthurt tankies.

    • filoria@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It costs more to own because it loses value more quickly… You mean, like all EVs? Or were you talking about the car losing half of its value the minute it drives off the lot?

  • filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Prove me wrong that this has nothing to do with the fact that China became the world’s biggest auto exporter last year and this is a desperate way for the US to try to protect their own auto industry.

    Free market, my bottom.

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Anti dumping tariffs aredesign to help all Americans. It’s not just protecting our economy but also a matter of national security.

        Best believe China is not selling each vehicle at a massive loss, paid for my the CCP, for the benefit for humanity. It’s there to dominate and destroy all car companies and then in turn dominate the world.

    • LittleBorat2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s obviously protectionist who said otherwise? Let China sell their cars to friendly nations, oh wait…

    • jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Well, it’s more than that. China is actively trying to dump on the market. Selling things at a loss so they can kill and steal market share.

      Sorta what Amazon did early on but on a global scale.

      • MarcoPOLO@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        This would be valid if… China was dumping. They’re not. They’re selling far above unit costs. In fact, their export models are often double or triple the price of domestic models of the same car.

      • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Is amazon even much of a thing outside the US? Like here in Europe they have like 2 places they ship from and it takes a week to arrive and costs 10x as much as ordering from a local online store. I don’t really know anyone who uses amazon regularly.

      • filister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        You do realise that you have described just now what all startups are doing in the US. Like look at WhatsApp, Facebook, etc. they were working for years if not decades on a massive loss in an attempt to more or less monopolize the segment, backed by the deep pockets of their investors.

        And I think it is only fair if you demand the same level of scrutiny to all companies involved in such practices.

        • jaschen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          American companies can’t dump. This is specifically for countries to protect their own industries.

          US companies can operate at a loss to gain market share, but the money losses is still in its own economy and not an outside foreign country that might not aligned with our countries values.

          Plus a company can only lose money for so long that eventually the market starts correcting itself and investors pull funding. Can’t be said about China which is basically unlimited money.

          The repercussions is drastic. China has already done this with solar panels. We are already beholden to them for this. If we were dependant on solar panels and not fossil fuel, they would literally be controlling our energy needs.

          • filister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            And the US has done this with so many industries, which you are trying to monopolize or control.

            And apparently you are okay when your own country is doing this but not okay when other countries are doing it.

            Does this seem fair to you, because sure as hell doesn’t seem to me.

            • jaschen@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              It’s not about fair. Anti dumping tariffs is designed to protect national security and national industries. We are not exclusive to this. China themselves does the same exact thing.

          • filister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Can you then explain to me what is the difference between

            US companies can operate at a loss to gain market share

            And dumping as in my books both are synonyms.

            And mind you we already have a couple of multi trillion companies now, if this isn’t access to infinite resources what is…

  • books@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I mean we see their cheap shitty batteries catching on fire in bikes, hoverboards, phones, laptops… Can you imagine their cars going up in flames?

  • cobra89@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yes Trump imposed the tariff but since Biden didn’t cancel it he gets the title of the article. What 🤡 shit.

    Also as another commenter pointed out, these vehicles would never pass NHTSA standards anyway.

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Correct, the person who has the power to change this right now gets in the title, because they have the power to change this right now and choose not to.

      Same with every policy Bush/Obama/Trump admins implemented yet Biden maintains, from torture facilities in foreign countries to blowing up children in Yemen to increased restrictions of Cuba.

  • Dra@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Well he is a politician, so its fairly likely this is something politicial…

  • IgnatiusJReilly@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Biden has to lead an increase in charging infrastructure. By the time that was underway (and automakers made some realistic affordable EVs) I think things would change.

    And trucks with clean diesel genny powered plug-in Hybrids.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I think the new Chinese made Volvo is one of the more interesting cars coming out this year. It’s $35k… AFTER the 27.5% tariff on Chinese made cars. Meaning, Volvo is actually selling this for $27k. The car is super minimal inside, but manufacturing in China is clearly allowing them to reduce costs a shit load.

    US auto manufacturing would be so screwed if these things could be sold without the tariff.

    Edit: also worth noting, they’re going to be leasing these direct in many states. No dealer markup.

    • MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      US Auto manufacturers have screwed themselves and the US public with their current production values.

      Happened in the 1970s, and Honda and Toyota ran wild. Unfortunately US automakers are more important, it seems, than those that bought their cars.