• OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I agree, the USSR assumed too much good faith on the part of NATO. Millions of casualties from economic devastation later, nationalist wars are still breaking out between former soviet states, and Nazism is on the rise.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          It literally doesn’t matter who is invading who, it wouldn’t have happened without the western backed coup of soviet democracy.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      There are other things to learn in history too, such as some countries, like Russia, simply lucking resources to fight wars this big. As the other commenter said, they can’t get past Ukraine.

      Hitler comparison is really out of place here. It’s more similar to some of the wars in Africa and Latin America.

    • Lad@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Who says anything about appeasement? That’s your words, not mine. Besides, Russia is already being appeased by NATO not letting Ukraine join.

      Why don’t NATO stop being cowards and admit Ukraine immediately? If they’re serious about “defending Europe and democracy”.

      • someguy3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Notice you don’t actually address appeasement doesn’t work?

        But as for military defence alliance (notice how you tried to misportray that?): Points to cold war.

        Something tells me you’re a Putin apologist.

        You should listen to Dan Carlin’s Hardcore History. WW1 was interesting.