• Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yep, make a note in the post body about the change, so that people have context for comments on the old article

      This depends on how different the new article is

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think you should link the better article in the comments or in an appendix to the post text.

    A post that is about an article should remain pointed at that article, in my opinion. It’s a matter of referential integrity.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’d say since Lemmy supports link posts with post text, you could also just put the link in the post text itself rather than comment it

  • Ace@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    IMO it’s ok as long as it’s clear what’s happened - i.e you make a note in the body of the post

    But, the age of the post and the number of comments make a difference. I wouldn’t edit a post more than a few hours old myself, or that has lots (subjective) of votes; and especially not if it has lots of comments, and especially especially not if the comments talk about specifics of the original article.

    5 mins after originally posting with 1 vote and no comments: fine

    2 days after originally posting with 1k votes and 100 comments: probably not fine.

    in the middle of those extremes: grey area, use good judgement, expect pushback

    tl;dr - depends