seth@lemmy.world to Programming@programming.dev · edit-28 months agoC++ creator rebuts White House warningwww.infoworld.comexternal-linkmessage-square102fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkC++ creator rebuts White House warningwww.infoworld.comseth@lemmy.world to Programming@programming.dev · edit-28 months agomessage-square102fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSuperb@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 months agoWhy can’t it be both a condemnation of C++ AND an inevitable consequence of success? C++ was a success, but we’ve learned a lot and it’s time to move on
minus-squaremox@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 months agoCondemning apples for having seeds doesn’t make a reasonable case for choosing other fruit, which also have seeds.
minus-squaresnowe@programming.devMlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 months agoit does if the other ones have edible seeds, seeds without arsenic, or fewer seeds… your analogy makes no sense.
Why can’t it be both a condemnation of C++ AND an inevitable consequence of success? C++ was a success, but we’ve learned a lot and it’s time to move on
Condemning apples for having seeds doesn’t make a reasonable case for choosing other fruit, which also have seeds.
it does if the other ones have edible seeds, seeds without arsenic, or fewer seeds… your analogy makes no sense.