Python is memory safe? Can’t you access/address memory with C bindings?

  • zik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It’s also a fallacy that rust code is memory safe. I audited a couple of large rust projects and found that they both had tens of unsafe constructs. I presume other projects are similar.

    You can’t use “unsafe” and then claim that your program’s memory safe. It may be “somewhat safe-ish” but claiming that your code is safe because you carefully reviewed your unsafe sections leaves you on the same shaky ground as c++, where they also claim that they carefully review their code.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t have the data, but I don’t think it’s wild to assume that most rust programs have 0-1 unsafe blocks, in total. Except for special cases like ffi.

      Even if your rust project has 1000s of unsafe blocks, it is still safer than C++, which is 100% an unsafe block. You only have to carefully review the parts marked “unsafe”, in C++ you have to carefully review the whole code.

      Also, because unsafe blocks are explicitly declared, you know which parts of the code require extra carefulness, and if you encounter a memory bug, doing Ctrl+F “unsafe” will soon show the root cause.