Attached: 1 image
Welp. It's official. #Redis is no longer #OSS
While I wasn't a contributor to the core, I presented on it dozens of times, talked to thousands, and wrote a book about it.
I probably wouldn't have done any of that with that kind of license.
Very disappointed.
Regardless of whether it is too strong or too ambiguous, it is absolutely an open source license regardless of whether the OSI and/or FSF approve of it.
Regardless of whether it is too strong or too ambiguous, it is absolutely an open source license regardless of whether the OSI and/or FSF approve of it.
Does not allow free redistribution for user, while developer can redistribute as they wish, making them unequal when software is in use.
Both free software and open source means freedom to share or sell modified copies of the software with no restrictions, no less.
In what way does SSPL not allow free redistribution for users but does for developers? It requires the source to be made available just like AGPL.