Alabama Republicans on Monday defended their decision not to create a second majority-Black district in a hearing before a panel of federal judges over the state’s redrawn congressional maps.

State Republicans continue to resist court orders, including from the supreme court in June, to amend the congressional maps to give Black voters increased political power and representation.

Lawyers for voters called Alabama’s plan, which maintains one majority-Black district, discriminatory. Abha Khanna, an attorney representing one group of plaintiffs in the case, said Alabama chose “defiance over compliance”.

In response to the ruling, Alabama Republicans boosted the percentage of Black voters in the majority-white second congressional district, now represented by Republican representative Barry Moore, from about 30% to 39.9%, failing to give Black voters a majority which would allow them to elect their candidate of choice.

A lawyer for the state accused plaintiffs of seeking a “racial gerrymander” over traditional guidelines for drawing districts, such as keeping districts compact and keeping communities of interest together.

  • TwoGems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Then arrest them. Or in Garland’s DOJ is it ok to just get away with anything simply because you’re a Republican?

    • DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Garland is spineless, the Right Wing’s current talking points are constantly about the weaponization of the DoJ, but that’s just for two reasons, making the Biden admin look like they’re “the big gubment coming to get conservatives” and normalizing what Trump and DeSantis and too many other Republican candidates want to actually do once they get control of the country back. Once that happens you will see useless hearings like the Hillary Benghazi hearings or worse, much worse.

      • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Garland should fucking be removed from the GOP if he refuses to do his fucking job. He never should have been appointed. He is a Republican that will allow them to do whatever they want.

    • stankmut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would be the courts responsibility to enforce the court order, not Garland’s. They need to issue a contempt of court ruling against the state.

  • esadatari@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    arrest them and form a completely redrawn map.

    fuck them at this point. like “aha! we refuse! checkMATE!”? bitch please.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    we’re about to see what happens if you tell the supreme court to get fucked. I assumed the next constitutional crisis was gonna be either marijuana laws or when some state decides to just not bother with elections, but this could be a fun one too

    • kbotc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, this just goes to a lower court who hands it off to a special master who then redraws the lines with zero input from their legislature: It’s if they try and ignore that is where we get into the fun “federal executive flexes it’s genitals at a state” and runs the election. Probably a long con, but the Republicans are going to lose at least one seat, and the special master may find a way to make them lose two.

  • Jordan Lund@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Congressional boundaries need to be drawn by a neutral party, not the political party which happens to be in power.

    Maybe that’s a potential use for generative AI?

    “Draw up a congressional boundary map for Alabama being sure to allocate each of the seven districts with an equal population and with two of the seven being a majority of African Americans.”

  • ivanafterall@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    More than 60 years after George Wallace and things appear unchanged in Alabama. Not that anyone expected much better from Alabama.

    • DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a feature not a bug to these people, conservatism is all about resisting progress even at their very own detriment.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Alabama Republicans on Monday defended their decision not to create a second majority-Black district in a hearing before a panel of federal judges over the state’s redrawn congressional maps.

    Abha Khanna, an attorney representing one group of plaintiffs in the case, said Alabama chose “defiance over compliance”.

    The results of the extended court battle could also determine whether Democrats pick up another seat in Congress, where Republicans currently hold a slim majority.

    “It’s unlawful to enforce proportionality over traditional redistricting principles,” Edmund LaCour, Alabama’s solicitor general, told the three-judge panel.

    Plaintiffs in the supreme court case attended with many wearing T-shirts printed with their proposed map which would have two majority-Black districts.

    “Alabama’s latest congressional map is a continuation of the state’s sordid history of defying court orders intended to protect the rights of Black voters,” former US attorney general Eric Holder, chairman of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, said in a statement.


    I’m a bot and I’m open source!