I thought of it more in terms of changing constants (by casting the const away). AFAIK when it’s not volatile, the compiler can place it into read-only data segment or make it a part of some other data, etc. So, technically, changing a constvolatile would be less of a UB compared to changing a regular const (?)
AFAIK when it’s not volatile, the compiler can place it into read-only data segment
That’s true, but preventing that is merely a side effect of the volatile qualifier. The reason for its existence is that some memory is changed by the underlying hardware, or by an external process, or by the act of accessing it.
The qualifier was a necessary addition to C in order to support such cases, which you might not encounter if you mainly deal with application code, but you’ll see quite a bit in domains like hardware drivers and embedded systems.
A const volatile variable is simply one that doesn’t accept explicit writes. A sensor value, for example.
const volatile is used a lot when doing HW programming. Const will prevent your code from editing it and volatile prevents the compiler from making assumptions. For example reading from a read only MMIO region. Hardware might change the value hence volatile but you can’t because it’s read only so marking it as const allows the compiler to catch it instead of allowing you to try and fail.
I was thinking about telling them how in embedded systems it’s a good practice to allocate the memory by hand, having in mind the backlog, but yours will come first
I thought of it more in terms of changing constants (by casting the
const
away). AFAIK when it’s notvolatile
, the compiler can place it into read-only data segment or make it a part of some other data, etc. So, technically, changing aconst volatile
would be less of a UB compared to changing a regularconst
(?)That’s true, but preventing that is merely a side effect of the volatile qualifier. The reason for its existence is that some memory is changed by the underlying hardware, or by an external process, or by the act of accessing it.
The qualifier was a necessary addition to C in order to support such cases, which you might not encounter if you mainly deal with application code, but you’ll see quite a bit in domains like hardware drivers and embedded systems.
A const volatile variable is simply one that doesn’t accept explicit writes. A sensor value, for example.
const volatile is used a lot when doing HW programming. Const will prevent your code from editing it and volatile prevents the compiler from making assumptions. For example reading from a read only MMIO region. Hardware might change the value hence volatile but you can’t because it’s read only so marking it as const allows the compiler to catch it instead of allowing you to try and fail.
I will not tell my kids regular scary stories. I will tell them about embedded systems
When you program embedded you’ll also dereference
NULL
pointers at some point.More...
Some platforms can have something interesting at memory address
0x0
(it’s oftenNULL
in C).In amd64/x86 kernel space you can dereference null as well. My hobby kernel keeps critical kernel structures there XD.
I was thinking about telling them how in embedded systems it’s a good practice to allocate the memory by hand, having in mind the backlog, but yours will come first
The very notion of “less of a UB” is against the concept of UB. If you have an UB in your program, all guarantees are out of the window.
I mean, changing a
const
is itself a questionable move (the question being whether the one doing it is insane)