• HottieAutie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I am male and have worked in both. Here are some trends I saw, which of course all have their exceptions.

    Advantages of mostly male workplaces

    • People are less likely to be offended
    • Straight forward communication
    • People are quicker to feeling comfortable with each other
    • People are quick to forgive each other

    Disadvantages of mostly male workplaces

    • Can be rough
    • Can result in hypermasculinity and competitiveness
    • More aggressive toward each other
    • Less compassionate of weaknesses or setbacks
    • Solutions to problems can be intense and aggressive

    Advantages of mostly female workplaces

    • More understanding of individual differences
    • Solutions tend to be less harmful/aggressive
    • Individual weaknesses are accepted and accommodated
    • Setbacks due to unexpected circumstances are more tolerated

    Disadvantages of mostly female workplaces

    • Gossip and drama
    • People can hold grudges for a long time
    • Shady and deceptive interpersonal interactions
    • People form cliques
    • Indirect communication with double meaning
    • Intentional misunderstanding to play power games
    • Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is spot on from my experience as well, you can even see this dynamic play out within individual departments in the same company.

      • Montagge@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Definitely not mine. Men gossip. are full of drama, form cliques, are easily offended, and do not forgive at all

      • Fleppensteyn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        We quickly go over our work and that’s it. As soon as women join, it becomes more informal, people talk about their free time etc.

        Another commentor calls it Straight forward communication (and he doesn’t get downvoted for it)

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Depending on what field of work you’re talking about, that can either be a good thing, a bad thing or a terrible thing.

      Having a quick five minute meeting just to go though the motions of a meeting doesn’t mean everyone is doing a good job.

  • SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    In my experience, predominantly male environments are fairly disdainful of anything non-technical and include a lot of unexamined biased views toward women. Workplaces with more women, or a balance of both, don’t have the same issue. in my experience.

    I’ve worked predominantly in two fields - engineering and environmental policy. I find the culture of engineering to be pretty toxic - too many conservative men. Environmental policy suffers from too much being demanded of workers, I think mostly because of the expectation that you’re motivated by your passion, rather than being paid for your time. I don’t know if that is directly tied to the gender balance in the workplace, but certainly women historically and presently are not compensated fairly for their work.

    It’s a shame that I’m better at doing engineering, because I vastly prefer to not work in a place where I can hear my boss listen to Hannity every day through the wall.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      “Unexamined bias” was exactly the word I phrase I was going to use. Homogenous working environments tend to ignore blindspots and assume that their team experience is universal.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I chose what happened to be a predominantly female class in my chosen job course in high school and social interactions definitely rolled off the tongue better.

  • anon6789@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve had plenty of good and bad coworkers of both genders, so I don’t care much about the ratio as long as everyone does roughly their fair share of the workload.

    As far as bonus points go, other guys are generally more into the same hobbies as me, so there’s more “bro talk” about that stuff. The girls seem to provide a wider range of topics and I learn about things I wouldn’t with just other guys. I have pretty diverse interests though, so having a mix of good guys and girls to talk with is the best scenario for me.

    About the only perk to working with majority males is then I’m not always the first one the boss asks to lug around heavy crap.

    I seem to feel for some of the girls in all girl teams though. They can be way harsher to each other than I’ve seen all male teams work. I would not be able to continue in some of the situations I’ve seen them put each other through…

  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Anecdotal but according to my SO who went from all female workplace to all male one the biggest difference is going from constant drama to no drama at all.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think this all depends on the people, not the gender … I’ve worked in several construction all male work crews and trust me, there is a lot of drama there too.

      • Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Have you worked in several all female crews as well? Its hard to judge when you don’t have a baseline to consider.

        • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not construction, but I’ve worked in restaurants where almost everyone was men, and others where all the servers were all women (most of the line staff were men, but the servers didn’t really interact with them much)

          At least in that environment, drama transcended gender.

          • Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Thats really interesting. I wonder how much the culture and expectations of norms in corporations makes a difference with this.

  • marshadow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve had good and bad experiences with mostly-male and mostly-female groups. I think it has less to do with the actual gender of the group, and more to do with: (a) the manner and extent to which group members are invested in performing their gender, (b1) whether the group embraces deviation from that performance, or (b2) whether one’s own performance of gender is similar enough to the group’s.

    I’ve often described myself as “not very good at being a woman.” My weirdness and difficulty with hidden meanings has gotten me shunned by fellow women and usually bullied out of all-female groups, particularly when I was young. But as I discovered a few years ago after adopting a more active lifestyle, I get along fantastically with most women who play sports.

    All-male groups were usually not much better. I still had to keep LARPing a persona, it’s just that the “cool girl” persona came easier to me. The main advantage was that mostly-male groups didn’t tend to say one thing while meaning the opposite. (For example, “stay as long as you like” actually means “you should probably go home now” and that is absolutely nonsensical to me.) But all-male groups never accepted me either, so the best case scenario meant being tolerated instead of shunned.

    When it comes to work environments, it’s only been women who played the game of psychologically tormenting me until I have a breakdown and quit (although one of those was a woman boss in a mostly-male small office). So mostly-male groups have been somewhat better because I usually don’t have to waste as much brainspace on LARPing the correct persona. I still tended to be treated more as a tagalong or novelty, though, and gender is only a weak predictor of future behavior (for example, one of my current coworkers is a man who politicks like a woman).

    • Kanzar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You sound like you might be on the spectrum. Couple of things you said pop out, difficulty with hidden meanings being the big one.

  • SadSadSatellite @lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’m a 6’5 reasonably muscular male running two offices entirely staffed by women, except for two gay guys. There’s no masculine competition, which is nice, and communication is much more personal. Due to my strict rule of not considering any of my coworkers potential partners, I make sure I’m as supportive as possible without being threatening to any of the girls or their respective partners. It’s very interesting seeing how patients act towards me vs the other workers. They seem to treat me as an authority figure, and take what I say at face value, even if I’m just confirming what one of the women already told them. The girls have to convince patients they’re professional and not jerking them around, where I can just state something and they’ll believe me. I’m viewed as a scientist, and the women are viewed as salesmen or interns.

    I mentioned my stature earlier, because it’s led to me being the office protector. I will defuse situations, defend my workers, and even fire patients if they offend anyone else in the office. If a rep for a company talks down to any of the women, or only wants to speak to me, I won’t do business with them.

    Ive hired men before, but they never last. They either make the girls uncomfortable, try to start relationships, or try to butt heads with me as if they hold authority over anyone else. It’s very easy to see how someone with less feministic views could easily take advantage of the situation I’m in.

    Edit: they’re always fucking cold though. 73 degrees is not fucking cold Donna. I’m wearing a suit. Put on a sweater.

    • Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I hear you on the cold part. So many tripped breakers from space heaters… and that one time, a very angry UPS that got plugged into.

  • Joenocide Biden@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    TL:DR; It really does not matter, they’re all shit.

    My first job was for a shitty mock UN community. It was filled mostly with women. I had to work as a salesman, convincing people to pay for this virtual MUN conference (does that make sense?). It was dehumanizing and stressful, I didn’t even know what I had gotten myself into. I could not get any customer, because I did not have the balls to scam people off their hard-earned money. I stuck around, with the hopes that at least I’ll end up with a certificate of internship to show my stupid university. I felt as if people looked at me as if I’m some MLM cultist. My higher-up was a woman around my age, maybe a little older - she was a piece of shit - why, because the way she manipulated parents and students into accepting this shitty virtual MUN, it was despicable. This was an unpaid inter-shit.

    My second job was basically a extern-shit from GitHub. Balanced male-female ration. I had to contribute to an open-source project, it was something like that. The male mentor was a piece of work. Kept reminding me how he was from a tier-1 Indian college and that I should be grateful for him accepting my proposal. The female mentor was as useful as a rotten bark, she was a yes-woman. Had no opinions of her own, other than adding fuel to the fire and enabling the toxic male mentor to insult us no-name college externs. Again, the salary was dog-shit. ₹10,000 per month, for three months.

    My third internshit was a highly toxic environment related to full-stack development, I’m not going to name this company. It was a male-dominated space. CEO of the company had no sense of boundary. Would call me at any time. Would not respond for days, and then at the day of the backlog, tell me that I’m supposed to complete my work without fail. And all of the stuff, be it database, styling, or backend logic, was on me. There was no convention for projects, no CI/CD workflow, no test/production/dev isolation. Thinking about the code-base still gives me nightmare. I had to work on a shitty, outdated Rails4 project, with CoffeeScript, using jQuery. Salary was ₹12,000 per month. Dog-shit salary. Garbage boss. No work-life balance. Worked for three months, and quit later. That was about a year ago. I’ve been unemployed since then. Applying to job gives me trauma and doubt my skill, because of the shitty, demanding jobs I had previously.

    • LowtierComputer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Applying for jobs is a slog, but once you do find a good one, it’s well worth it. It sounds like you’ve only worked at some terrible places.

    • NightoftheLemmy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Although your situation is really terrible and I wish you are able to land a better workspace environment with a reasonable pay, I believe you missed the point of the entire OP’s question.