• Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    ITT: people calling for revolution who will never do a damn thing about it. It’s easy to pretend violence is the answer when you’ll never participate, let alone start something.

    • kibiz0r@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Even if you assume those LARPers are willing to sacrifice themselves in bloody revolution for the good of the common folk…

      Who do you think suffers most when civil war disrupts supply chains, essential services, and the legal system?

      It’s the dang common folk they’re supposedly dying to protect!

      • zea@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        As if Trump wouldn’t exterminate them harder. With just the choice between these 2 candidates, I vote for the lesser genocider and then apply as much pressure as possible to lower that genocidey-ness even more. Short of a revolution, it’s the best we can do.

            • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              That’s a pretty selfish thing to say. To borrow from the stupid metaphor, I don’t want the driver to continue to run people over on the way to the ice cream parlor

              • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                The route to the cliff would run over way more people, and attempting to wrest control of a speeding bus is liable to hit even more. Why not vote for the ice cream place and make the avoidance of collisions a key priority? That seems like a safer option for everyone.

      • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not in America, but I’m trans and have a number of trans friends in the states who are really scared right now. I live in Australia and have participated in pro-Palestine protests (if that’s who you’re implying with that). I loathe Biden, I think he’s a shitty old white dude, and I wish y’all could do better. But if protesting against Biden allows Trump to be elected, then there WILL be far worse consequences, both domestically and abroad. Thousands of trans people will lose their lives, and countless more will lose access to life-saving care. He will likely cut off support to Ukraine considering how he’s ingratiated himself to Putin. He hasn’t indicated he’d stop supporting Israel either.

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          But if protesting against Biden allows Trump to be elected, then there WILL be far worse consequences

          That’s 100% on Biden for being a legit protest target, not on the individuals with a moral compass who are pointing out his issues.

          If we don’t want our non-fascist option to be protested against because it means they lose then there should be a better choice available

          • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’m sorry, but I genuinely think that’s reductive and stupid. In Australia, I get to have a choice. And every time I’ve voted, I exercised that choice to put someone other than our Democrats first on my ballot. Knowing my vote would still flow to them before electing someone who would rather see me dead. You don’t get to have that choice, and you can blame your founding father’s and the various people in control of your government since for that fact. But if you choose not to vote because Biden isn’t good enough, you are making a conscious choice towards fascism.

            God. I called it in June 2016 and I’m calling it again now. Y’all are going to end up with Trump again because of people like you. And it’s going to fucking suck to be an Aussie online again for four years. Probably bloody longer.

            • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              you are making a conscious choice towards fascism.

              It’s fun to watch people write paragraphs of shit acting like they’ve got a point and then say something this objectively stupid because they don’t actually know what they’re on about.

              I live in California, if I chose to not vote I’m making a conscious choice to support Biden, as that is who my states electoral votes are going to. If I chose to vote for any third party it’s the same outcome. Only if I explicitly vote for Trump (or another potential fascist) am I actually supporting fascism

              But what if too many of you Californians think that and Biden loses?!

              I can assure you that’s not happening here, though I’ve seen so many people online try to fear monger that it might. If t actually were a threat I’d get in lock-step for Biden to prevent fascism, but it’s not so I won’t.

              • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                if enough Californians opposed genocide to make it so that Biden didn’t get the California electoral votes, imagine the impact. seriously. it would be unprecedented.

          • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Well too bad. This is what we got. Either join the rest of us in reality or become yet another person helping fascists seize power.

    • root_beer@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      And then they think they’ll be part of the vanguard when the power vacuum opens up, and will give way to a glorious socialist utopia. Guess what, turbo, you’ll be up against that wall too, and it’s just going to be roving gangs of authoritarians.

    • EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Way too many of these chucklefucks just want to LARP as pure and radical revolutionaries. My wife and I are disabled and live on a fixed income of her disability payments and the SNAP program. If this “revolution” they want so bad does come, then we’re among the most likely to just fucking starve in the disruption. I’m also one of the people the GOP declared they want to “Eradicate from Public Life” with Project 2025.

      Now, I’m not much of a Genocide Enjoyer. I think it’s one of the worst things you can do in fact. But I also don’t take too kindly to being effectively told that I specifically should just die because these wannabe revolutionaries refuse to entertain a world where we both vote for Biden to keep Trump from destroying democracy more than the GOP already has (harm reduction), AND engage in direct action to push Biden away from blindly supporting Israel.

            • EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Nah, I’m good. I’ll continue to vote for Biden because he’s infinitely more likely to be swayed to stop the genocide than Trump who if I’m not mistaken has literally expressed a desire to accelerate the genocide on top of all the other heinous shit in Project 2025.

              You can hate me all you want for not lining my family up to starve to death in “muh glorious revolution” or to lose our means of continuing to live when Trump tries to gut the Social Security that my family lives off of, or the SNAP benefits that feed us, or however they decide they want to eradicate my disabled trans ass from public life. Call me selfish for wanting myself and my family to continue living in addition to doing what I can to stop the genocide. I really don’t care. LARP away my dude.

              • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                How does voting for someone who is funding a genocide going to sway that person to stop funding it? It’s just illogical. There are plenty of Democrats who are active Zionists and support the war, probably a fair number are wealthy donors. The only way to sway the policy of the Democratic party is to threaten to their power.

                I don’t think you’re selfish, and I don’t hate you lol, I just think you’re not seeing the enormous potential of forming a leftist voting coalition. Imagine how amazing it would be if the Democratic Party was trying to cater to the votes of leftists, and not to “moderates” who think that an openly white nationalist candidate is a viable potential option.

                • EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  That would be fantastic, I’d love it if the Democrats would stop doing what they’ve been doing the last 30+ years of punching left and chasing the “Moderates” rightward. But let’s think about this logically for a minute. What are the possible outcomes of what you’re proposing?

                  • Coalition Victory. We install an actual leftist in the White House. Fantastic. No more Genocide. We have a little socialism as a treat maybe? No notes. I love it. But that means we have right now about 7 months to produce or align behind a 3rd party candidate, one who likely won’t be allowed on the ballot in several states, Then that candidate has to get enough votes to beat BOTH Biden and Trump meaning they basically have to pull at least like 18% of the vote from both sides in enough states to win the Electoral College.
                  • Trump Victory. Considerably less fantastic. Democrats blame the Leftists for Biden’s loss as usual. Okay, we threatened their power and now maybe we can convince them that they need us to win in 2028 rather than them moving even further right as they have since Clinton. But meanwhile we still haven’t stopped the Genocide, Donnie’s probably gonna attempt to speedrun it in fact, we’ve got Project 2025 to worry about. I don’t know about you, but I don’t think Gaza’s going to last until 2028.
                  • Biden Victory. Not as bad as Trump winning. Genocide is still happening in Gaza, unlike Trump he at least might be able to be convinced to end the genocide in a sense other than the Completionist one. Only now we’ve proven to the Democrats that they don’t need the leftists at all actually and they’re free to move as far right as they wish. So maybe we even lose that.

                  Maybe we get incredibly lucky and Trump gets screwed over by these prosecutions and splits the GOP thus lowering the threshold for us to get an actual Leftist in? I’m not sure we can count on it with how the Judiciary is bending over backwards to try to delay these prosecutions until the election where presumably they’d all “have to get put on hold because it’s looks bad to be putting a presidential candidate on trial.” Y’know, that old chestnut.

                  Realistically, we have to reckon with the fact that First Past the Post Winner Take All Voting and the Electoral College screws us here. There’s a reason these systems mathematically tend towards a 2 party system. It’s incredibly frustratingly difficult, nigh on mathematically impossible to break through the tendency for Strategic Voting that this system breeds. It’s the Prisoner’s Dilemma, but on a massive scale. A scale where we can only afford what, maybe a hundred thousand people getting scared and bailing on the plan at most for us all to get the worst possible outcome?

    • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      As easy as it is to vote, its even easier to whine about why not doing it is better(?) Maybe?

      Then they come at u like theyre so very superior for not voting. Like theyre going to start a revolution by yelling at the people supposedly closest to them in ideology. Bc, clearly, voting is only done by libs, so if u advocate for voting ur a superlib. Then theyll simp for china or russia, and act like even neoliberal countries dont have leftist parties attempting to participate in the government theyre so keen on making u forsake.

      Almost like theres a vested interest in there… somewhere…

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Sounds like something a cliff hater would say.

    We’ll all be rich at the bottom of the canyon.

  • daltotron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Buses tend to have an emergency stop that you’re supposed to hit in the event that the driver has like, a heart attack, or something, right?

  • anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    All I see is panic. supposedly If the majority of women were pro-abortion, you wouldn’t have to worry about Trump and republicans winning the next elections. women alone would flip the red states. but apparently not all women agree with abortion.

  • alphanerd4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    counterpoint, its not either or. this is a false dichotomy the democrats created and maintain as a rhetorical device to silence dissent. i will never vote for joe biden. ill vote for…, a couple of democrats down ballot. and that is the extent of my interaction with the legitimate systems of democracy in the US. if you dont live in a swing state, the presidential race is, effectively, not real for you. this is a basic tenant of “american electoral politics” , or as I like to call it, a tenant of US Authoritarianism

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      i encourage you to reconsider your position. the spoiler effect is real and so are elections and their consequences. someone is getting put into that seat and you have the opportunity to influence the situation.

      this post may be helpful, encourage you to check it out

  • OnePhoenix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    This argument (to me at least) assumes that the other 4 non-voters would have all voted for ice cream which, by just using basic logic, is false. If 3 out of 5 have already voted to drive off a cliff, one has to assume that at least 2 of the remaining 4 would also vote to drive off a cliff. Now this argument is back to square one… How do we find a solution which doesn’t give ‘driving off a cliff’ as an option in the first place?

  • Emmy@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Harm reduction is fine, but faced with a view going that way, why not use ranked choice. First choice might be I’ve cream, but if you can’t do that, perhaps going somewhere else works.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Problem. Harm reduction voting requires at least one good faith candidate.

    Right now we have choice between the scenic route to go off the cliff and the express route. Electoral boycotts are effective once they reach critical mass. Telling everyone they need to vote harm reduction without a good faith candidate is just suppressing the natural tendency of a democracy to flush a bad set of leaders.

    We could also use a general strike but they’ll just order us back to work and call it a union victory.

  • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The most convincing argument I’ve heard for voting third party instead of for Genocide Joe is that liberals were more politically engaged and had more of an activist mentality under Trump.

    Also, I’ve given consideration to the idea that “vote blue no matter who” types would likely vote for a more leftist Democrat than the ones currently being offered. In a long term strategy, if leftists refuse to vote for Democratic candidates who are too far right, then the Democrats would have to either try to appeal to the Trump demographic (which they do unfortunately do), or appeal to the leftist demographic until they get the leftist votes back.

  • Noodle07@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    For all the fatalists I’ll bring beer so we can watch the world burn together after you’ve voted

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m a fan of harm reduction. There might still be harm, but it’s more limited than it was previously.

    It’s not the whole solution and always needs further actions at the end of the day, but it’s movement in the right direction.

    Far better than just coasting along waiting for things to get worse.