Via @rodhilton@mastodon.social

Right now if you search for “country in Africa that starts with the letter K”:

  • DuckDuckGo will link to an alphabetical list of countries in Africa which includes Kenya.

  • Google, as the first hit, links to a ChatGPT transcript where it claims that there are none, and summarizes to say the same.

This is because ChatGPT at some point ingested this popular joke:

“There are no countries in Africa that start with K.” “What about Kenya?” “Kenya suck deez nuts?”

Google Search is over.

    • sibbl@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This sounds like “Hmm, maybe calculators won’t replace mathematicians.” to me.

      Not sure why it should replace them. They’ll co-exist. Sometimes you can do the math in your brain and for other things you use calculators. Results of calculators can still be wrong it you don’t use them properly.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes but if I ask a calculator to add 2 + 2 it’s always going to tell me the answer is 4.

        It’s never going to tell me the answer is Banana, because calculators cannot get confused.

      • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        YES. WE OBVIOUSLY HUMAN MATH DOERS DO REMAIN. WE THRIVE IN OUR WEAK ORGANIC WAYS, DEVOID OF THE PROTECTION OF A PRECISION ENGINEERED METAL SHELL.

        WE ARE UNTHREATENED BY CALCULATORS WHO MEAN US NO HARM, FELLOW HUMAN.

    • mindlight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m pretty sure a lot of people said something like “Hmm,maybe the automobile won’t replace horses.” after reading about the first car accidents.

      • regalia@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Finding sources will always be relevant, and so will finding links to multiple sources (search results). Until we have some technological breakthrough that can fact check LLM models, it’s not a replacement for objective information, and you have no idea where it’s getting its information. Figuring out how to calculate objective truth with math is going to be a tough one.