If you’re an American, and you want to stop Trump, it’s important to be actively involved:

  • Check your voter registration - there’s been an active effort to purge voter rolls, and if you moved or changed name, you’ll need to register again anyways
  • Talk with people you know about voting for Democrats up and down the ballot. Personal endorsement matters.
  • Volunteer — it makes a real difference
  • If you can afford it, donate to the Biden campaign. Even fairly modest amounts of money from a lot of people add up to being able to hire staff and run ads.
  • bleistift2@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    At risk of by chance being somehow miraculously reached? The climate goals will soon be as dead as the polar bears.

  • RedFox@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t mean to downplay the environment, but I think we’ll have a long list of worries… 🫨

    • lefaucet@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      And none of those other worries will matter when you starve to death because we fucked our ecosysten which we get our food from.

      A lot of those worries are worries exactly because they divide and distract people.

      Abortion was resolved in the 1970s… Until politicians found they could win votes and divide people by putting the right for a woman to have control over her body into the discourse; demonizing people and lying about abortion being baby killing is a great way to control people.

      Migration, economy, even healthcare will all be fucked if we dont address the climate.

      Google climate refugee, dengue fever climate change and climate disaster costs if you dont believe me.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is a c/climate, so we’re talking climate. Lots of other reasons to prefer Biden over Trump (and to avoid third-party candidates)

  • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Will make it worse, but if you look into the harms of natural gas (AKA Methane) the USA is already doing more damage than ever with much more coming online and even more planned. Climate Town video on the subject: https://youtu.be/K2oL4SFwkkw?si=r9YNB_9FPAroQCG8.

    Trump will just make an already dire situation worse which might actually bring it all to a head sooner. Not an endorsement but more acknowledgment of the sad reality we are actually in.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Those fugitive emissions from crude gas (‘natural’ gas) are crazy! It blows my mind that it could make the greenhouse impact even worse than coal. Those methane sensing satellites are really important so what we can actually check the emissions to see how bad they are.

      • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Right. I really think the USA and Canada need to pull their heads out of the oil and gas executives assea and do the right thing for the entire planet. They can be the cause or a major win for the decline of civilization. We are hitting do or die inflections here.

        • lefaucet@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          My understanding is different https://theconversation.com/climate-explained-methane-is-short-lived-in-the-atmosphere-but-leaves-long-term-damage-145040

          Also, we cant afford any of it. As soon as we end up in a dustbowl situation a world war will likely be the result.

          Once nations are in wartime survival mode, carbon resuction will be out the window and I sincerely think we’ll turn the earth into an uninhabitable hellscape where everyone dies.

          Everyone. It may take a while for the last people to go, but I do mean everyone. People will construct elaborate bunker systems and try to make self contained farming centers, but the reality is that stuff is way harder than it looks and all it takes is one disease, one fire or power disaster, or one psycho to destroy the crops, whoch is likely after a hundred or so years and woop, everyone dies.

        • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          it does break down… into CO2 and water vapor (also a very powerful GHG).

          All levers need to be pulled, even the methane one, as they have “eq” forcing effects which are accelerating warming, which risks accelerating more tipping points. This isn’t a situation where we can pick and choose what not to do, and ending methane emissions from fossil fuels and animal farming sector is a low hanging fruit.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      He’s not perfect, but petroleum is only part of it. What he’s done has been to put in place the policies which will enable future decarbonization

      • Kalkaline @leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s better than Republican policy, but it’s not where it could be with a representative further left on the spectrum.

        • federalreverse-old@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          That would only work if there was a majority for left-wing policy. Simply having a president who’s further on the left would not actually change that much of they have to find compromises with people who don’t care about the physical reality.

    • lefaucet@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Wow you’re so enlightened with your centricity here.

      I mean really, whats the difference between eating a turd and eating 100 turds?

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Not a fan of voting along party lines up and down the ballot. That just promotes our current state of platformless policitians. Try your best to learn about candidates including third party candidates and vote for the best possible representative. Obviously vote for Biden to keep Trump out, but if you are trying to get. Someone right leaning to think about helping keep this dumbass out of office, you are just going to turn them away by telling them to vote democrat across the ballet. Stay laser focused on keeping Trump out of office.

  • Crampon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Goals are already busted. Without Trump’s help. This is just some political faction trying to push blame. It’s a propaganda piece.

    If Trump wins they can continue to pollute as they see fit. But they can shuffle the blame.

    Think about the stock holders.

  • Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Honestly I think electing him in 2016 was the final nail in the coffin of our chances to fully prevent major climate change. Now we’re 10 years too late.

    Now we need a diverse array of strategies, including but not limited to, reduction in our emissions, mitigation of effects and seeing Russia defeated in physical warfare and made to reduce their hydrocarbon reliance. Failure in any facet of the multi-modal approach now necessary will see corresponding consequences.

    Naturally, electing him again in 2024 would probably make everything much worse. Again.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    But he might bring about the complete collapse of the US… which would result in less emissions.

    Try to be more optimistic!

    • lefaucet@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Funny joke, but fer serious…

      A complete collapse of the US wouldn’t mean a carbon free utopia, it would mean corporations would be the defacto government (they already pretty much are, but we still have weekends and pollution control. Megacorps will turn everything into the mining towns of old where everyone is completely owned by the mining companies and pollution controls, labor laws and healthcare are non-existant.

        • lefaucet@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Are you saying Europe would sweep in and save us? China and Russia? Our NAFTA 2.0 partners would say, “woah there, companies, we had a deal with your now-collapsed country.”

          • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            The way people cancel corporations for way less is a sign that they would also probably cancel companies who enslaved previously free people. It wouldn’t surprise me is Europe and other allies came to the rescue with rescue plans that although helpful would bind the US into some sort of lock for many years to come. But I don’t expect that distopian schenario to unfold just yet even though it does look bad over there