But people were bad at assessing whether images were made by artificial intelligence or an artist.

  • Daxtron2@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I don’t care whether or not you call it art, but calling it ‘just throwing some text in a computer’ is just factually incorrect.

    • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s exactly what it is to me. It’s an unskilled effort for a barely mediocre result. If programming a robot to throw a football doesn’t make someone an athlete, than it’s not artistry to type a sentence.

      • Daxtron2@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s not subjective, there is more to the process than just writing prompts. Are 3d modelers unskilled because all they do is move a mouse and occasionally type on a keyboard? 2d digital artists are just moving around a fake pen on a plastic tablet. Programmers type words into a text file. You’re horribly oversimplifying. Of course someone could just do a basic prompt and post their raw gens, but that also happens all the time with sketches, story ideas, and just newer artists in general. There is a lot of pre and post processing that goes into making something worth looking at.

        • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s my opinion, and I’m keeping it. No amount of whataboutism is going to change that- so just walk away from this.

            • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              No, it’s an opinion. You really should learn what opinions are, and how they work. Because considering AI is capable of making art is ALSO an opinion.