• DrQuint@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would assume the top answer would be “fuck capitalism” with a sprinkle of “lmao”

      • Conyak@lemmy.tf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Capitalism is fucking us all equally so it shouldn’t be a lib idea only but you are probably right.

      • Liberalism is defined by support of capitalism, the two terms can often be used interchangeably.

        You’re looking at anarchism, communism, democratic socialism if you’re opposed to capitalism.

        Though experience tells me a lot of the people going “fuck capitalism” just want the capitalists and politicians to be a little less greedy and give some more crumbs to the working class within the imperial core.

  • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think majority here is left-sided. I personally am right/ conservative (European wise).

    However unfortunately, most of the right-side communities are filled with hate and thus, I avoid it.

    • ieightpi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That makes you left leaning to an American’s perspective. The political spectrum over here is far right, even the left in the US is technically right center.

    • BluesF@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except an actual compas, of course. They really don’t need a third axis in most cases.

    • goddamnpipes@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m afraid I’m only familiar with the 2-axis political compass: Left/Right and Auth/Lib.

      How many axes do you think there should be in an effective political chart, and what aspects of a political position should each one represent?

      • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be robust, it needs a social axis distinct from the heirarcy / authority axis, a political status-quo-vs-reform axis, and a dedicated economic policy axis. So, at least four.

        • waterbogan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you know of a test that has these axes, or more? I would be very interested to take it if so, and I am inclined to agree with you about the political compass test and others like it - they dont capture the true complexity of most people’s political views - I’m all over the place myself

          • LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Each axis would give it a new dimension. One axis is just a line, two are a flat square, three would be a cube and adding a fourth one would literally make it 4d, which we cannot perceive with our eyes. It’s one of the reasons it’s so hard to accurately describe a person’s politics using a chart, aside from the other methodological issues.

  • angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Overall it’d probably lean toward the middle of the left side, with no strong leaning on the Authoritarian/Libertarian axis.

    Very few people on here that aren’t to the left of Blairites or Establishment Democrats. Quite a few Marxist-Leninists, but not a majority. The few right-of-center people here seem to be either Euroskeptics or ancaps who somehow still believe any alternative from the corporate mainstream will be mostly used by ancaps.

      • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A part of it I was trying to say euphemistically because the whole thing is tense, I even had links. I just can’t win sometimes it seems.

  • BellaDonna@mujico.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s not as left leaning as Reddit. I see a lot of disagreement with leftist ideas, more liberal or libertarian ideals are what I see the most. It’s been refreshing to see the diversity, Reddit was an echo chamber of pure leftist values and that’s not an accurate cross section of discourse and range of ideas.

    • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I didn’t think Reddit was (or is) quite aels echoey as that. Lots of left wing views (or what passes for left wing in the States anyway) but plenty of people arguing against it in my experience.

      Mostly though ,it was just a very silly place. And all the better for it.

      • BellaDonna@mujico.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m sure that my perspective is a little influenced by the specific subreddits and communities I read, but overall Reddit still had an extreme auth left tone, whereas six years ago it was still primarily libleft, with a lot of classic liberal ideals.

        This has also mirrored larger cultural shifts in English speaking countries.

  • Throwaway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Multiple groups.

    A lot of normal-ish people, probably the majority.

    Fairly large tankie instances of hexbear and lemmygrad. Hexbears are insufferable, but lemmygrad users are fine.

    Small amount of conservatives. Not a ton, but I think we have critical mass.

    The key take away is we actually get along for the most part.

    • Frub@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I genuinely don’t understand what hexbear is about. There’s a bit of everything there and none good lmao