• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s going to be a Twitter Files where Matt Taibbi exposes this in long form tweets, right?

    Wait, they changed the name. It will have to be called the X Files now. I’m sure that won’t be problematic.

      • loobkoob@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree it should perhaps have started off a little higher, but the fine was set so the amount added would double for every day they didn’t comply.

        • day 1: $50,000
        • day 2: +$100,000 ($150,000 total)
        • day 3: +$200,000 ($350,000 total - this is what they paid)
        • day 4: +$400,000 ($750,000 total)
        • day 7: +$3,200,000 ($6,350,000 total)
        • day 14: +$409,600,000 ($819,150,000 total)
        • day 28: +$6.7 trillion ($13.4 trillion total)

        The day 3 fine wasn’t all that bad for them, but it wasn’t a fine they could just eat if they delayed as long as they wanted. Definitely not a “cost of doing business” fine, that’s for sure.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is a cost of business fine at $350k.

          Yes, the escalating fine is great and got compliance. I was commenting on the fact that since they eventually complied and paid a small fine, they won’t be charged with anything further even knowing the delay was intentional.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        For a normal functional company, yeah, it would be nothing.

        But Twitter has never made money, now owes billions in loan payments, already let a bunch of staff go, and stopped paying rent on buildings…

        And not paying this on time (which they might legitimately not have the funds) can result in a lot more money or even criminal charges.

  • iyaerP@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds like Twitter needs some obstruction of justice charges and for some people to get arrested.

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can drag your feet as long as you can pay a lawyer to find a reason to stand up and argue. Somehow that’s not generally obstruction of justice. See how Trump has always evaded jail with this tactic.

      • persolb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not for their argument they can’t.

        They seem to have been arguing about the non-disclosure to the public/Trump, not the actual delivery of the tweets.

        If they’d delivered the tweets/drafts, they would have complied with no downside, and still been able to fight the non-disclosure. (Or just do what they did anyway, and tell people about it)

  • identity99567@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Requesting the drafts is interesting. I wonder if they thought they were being clever by sharing an account and communicating via draft messages.

  • mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder if Elon’s tweet will apply here:

    If you were unfairly treated by your employer due to posting or liking something on this platform, we will fund your legal bill, No limit. Please let us know.

    Obviously I expect Elon is full of shit and won’t actually do this (or do it 1-2 times then get bored) but it would be funny to watch 2 assholes (Elon/Trump) fight over it.